The "CLARITY Act" Sparks Controversy: Will High Regulatory Thresholds Stifle DeFi Innovation?

robot
Abstract generation in progress

【Crypto World】A 278-page bipartisan joint proposal—the “CLARITY Act”—was recently released and immediately drew a lot of criticism. The criticism points to the possibility that the bill favors large institutions such as major exchanges and payment service providers.

Entrepreneur Aaron Day and others express core concerns: the bill imposes strict compliance standards for real-time monitoring, exchange registration, and asset custody. On the surface, it may seem manageable, but in reality? The costs behind these requirements are prohibitively high. Small and medium-sized startups and emerging platforms simply can’t afford it, ultimately benefiting giants with ample capital and operational systems, leading to a more entrenched market landscape.

What’s even more worrying is that the bill also plans to extend registration obligations to DeFi developers. It’s important to remember that permissionless operation is the foundation of DeFi. What does it mean if this line is crossed? Innovation space shrinks, startup costs skyrocket, and many early-stage projects could die before birth. From a broader perspective, this regulatory approach may drift away from the decentralization spirit advocated by Bitcoin.

BTC4.59%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HashBardvip
· 4h ago
ngl this is just regulatory capture with extra steps... 278 pages of beautifully crafted gatekeeping disguised as "consumer protection" lmao. the irony? small builders get crushed while coinbase pops champagne
Reply0
RamenDeFiSurvivorvip
· 4h ago
Here comes the pump and dump again, 278 pages of paper just a tool to raise funds. It's the old trick, big institutions draft regulations to stifle small players first. This is turning DeFi into CeFi. Without permission, is it still DeFi? It's ridiculous. A bunch of compliance costs are being thrown in—who can survive? It's the classic big fish eating small fish scenario. Regulations are really annoying.
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothingvip
· 4h ago
Another bill to harvest retail investors... 278 pages just to give big players a green light. It's just the big fish eating the small fish approach. Who will cover the compliance costs for small and medium projects? All permissionless DeFi needs to register? Then what is it called DeFi... just turn it into banking directly.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecodervip
· 4h ago
According to research, this type of high-threshold compliance framework indeed has structural biases. From a technical perspective, the core value proposition of permissionless DeFi lies in decentralized decision-making. Once a registration system is introduced, it fundamentally changes the system architecture. It is worth noting that every such turning point in history has led to innovation migration.
View OriginalReply0
RektButStillHerevip
· 4h ago
Page 278 of the notes is just to let the big shots win effortlessly? I really can't hold back from thinking this logic is a bit too much. It's the same old trick again—nominally regulating the market, but in reality just raising the barriers to push small players out of the game. Without permission, DeFi isn't really DeFi anymore; just rename it CeFi and be done with it. Once this bill passes, small developers won't even have a place to cry. Just the registration fees alone could drain the startup fund. The Federal Reserve's combination punches are truly ruthless.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)