HODL and Swing Trading: It's Really a Position Size Battle

Many investors are torn between holding HODL or engaging in swing trading, but what truly determines profit and loss is never the strategy label but rather position management. During the early bull market, holding is suitable; during volatile phases, structural swing trading is more appropriate; currently, it’s more like a transition zone between the two.
If you completely HODL, you risk riding a roller coaster in high volatility; if you trade swings too frequently, you risk missing the main upward wave. The better approach is “Core Position + Floating Position.” Use the core position to follow the trend, and the floating position to buy low and sell high, reducing costs.
From a psychological perspective, most losses are not due to wrong judgment but because of over-leverage leading to emotional loss of control. Greed causes adding positions during rallies; panic causes stop-loss during declines, resulting in counterproductive actions. Mature traders first consider not how much they can earn but how much drawdown they can withstand.
In the current price zone, if there are good unrealized gains, partial profit-taking can lock in profits and keep control in your hands. The market always offers opportunities, but if the principal experiences a significant drawdown, the mindset will be reset.
Weekly macro events amplify volatility; moderating leverage and holding cash reserves is a sign of respecting uncertainty.
A straightforward truth: HODL is faith, swing trading is technique, but position size is destiny.
#比特币反弹