Tap to Trade in Gate Square, Win up to 50 GT & Merch!
Click the trading widget in Gate Square content, complete a transaction, and take home 50 GT, Position Experience Vouchers, or exclusive Spring Festival merchandise.
Click the registration link to join
https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7401
Enter Gate Square daily and click any trading pair or trading card within the content to complete a transaction. The top 10 users by trading volume will win GT, Gate merchandise boxes, position experience vouchers, and more.
The top prize: 50 GT.
 operates the infrastructure—pipelines, storage facilities, and distribution networks—that moves oil and natural gas globally. By charging fees based on volume rather than commodity prices, Enterprise achieves remarkable stability.
The distribution yield reaches 6.8%, substantially higher than Chevron’s dividend. More impressively, Enterprise has increased its distribution annually for 27 consecutive years, matching its tenure as a publicly traded entity. The company generates 1.7 times the cash flow needed to support its distribution, providing a substantial safety margin before any reduction would be necessary.
Enterprise’s balance sheet carries investment-grade ratings, indicating capacity to tap capital markets during stress scenarios. This combination of fee-based economics, consistent distributions, and financial strength appeals to conservative investors seeking maximum yield with manageable risk.
A notable consideration: MLP structures create tax complications unsuitable for tax-advantaged retirement accounts like IRAs. Shareholders must file K-1 forms during tax season, adding administrative burden. For some investors, this extra complexity outweighs the yield advantage; for others, the enhanced distribution justifies the effort.
Comparing Risk Profiles: Which Oil Stock Suits Your Goals
Both Chevron and Enterprise Products represent attractive pathways into energy investing, yet they serve different investor profiles. Enterprise generally presents lower risk due to its insulation from commodity price movements and its 27-year distribution consistency. The MLP structure and tax complications, however, may deter certain investors.
Chevron offers more direct participation in oil and gas operations. While subject to greater commodity price exposure, its integrated structure and fortress balance sheet provide meaningful downside protection compared to pure upstream producers. The 4.5% yield remains compelling for dividend portfolios.
Most diversified investors should maintain meaningful energy exposure. Choosing between these two oil stocks to buy ultimately depends on whether you prioritize maximum yield and minimal commodity sensitivity (Enterprise) or prefer direct oil and gas involvement with competitive returns (Chevron). Both positions merit consideration in a balanced income-focused portfolio.