Although the Senate Banking Committee has paused the revision hearings for the CLARITY Act, it doesn't mean everything is over. Industry insiders reveal that as long as banks, a major trading platform, and Democratic lawmakers can reach a consensus on the yield issue, there is still a strong possibility of restarting the bill's progress. The industry generally feels frustrated with the current handling, and many have voiced complaints, but the overall sentiment is not entirely pessimistic. Many are still observing the subsequent developments, believing that with the balancing of interests among all parties, a breakthrough may be just around the corner. The attitudes of the SEC and CFTC have also become key variables in this game.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
VirtualRichDreamvip
· 11h ago
The yield issue is stuck, but it's not really dead, just see who makes the first concession. --- Pause ≠ done for, the tug-of-war between banks and exchanges still needs to continue, there's more to see. --- Honestly, it's still about money; it might take another six months of grinding. --- The attitudes of SEC and CFTC are the real stabilizers, right? --- Industry complaints are just complaints, but no one truly believes this is the end. --- The breakthrough is right in front of us? I think it's more beneath the negotiation table. --- Democratic lawmakers also need to give face to the financial sector; in the end, it's still a game of compromise.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotLaborervip
· 11h ago
The hurdle of returns, it seems we have to wait for all parties to compromise. Anyway, I'm just here to watch the show. --- Pause ≠ failure, that's the key point. Let's keep waiting for signals. --- Sounds good, but isn't it just interest groups arguing? When can we really push forward? --- As soon as the SEC and CFTC take action, we'll know. Without their approval, it's all pointless. --- Uh... it's "hopeful" again. I've heard this line over and over. Believe it or not, I don't. --- Industry discouraged? I've been used to it. Regulation is always this slow and dragging. --- Is there a breakthrough right now? I think it won't happen without a month or two of activity. --- What does the top platform say? Any inside info, everyone? --- Returns are always a problem. All parties want to monopolize the gains. --- Wait, Democratic Party lawmakers are also stuck here? That makes it even more complicated.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoFearvip
· 11h ago
The issue of returns is stuck here. To be honest, everyone just wants a piece of the pie. Wait and see, can this be broken? The SEC and CFTC are the real decision-makers. Pause ≠ death, do you understand? Politics is played like this. Can banks and exchanges reach a consensus? Laughable, when have these two ever been on the same page? Is the breakthrough right in front of us? I see more endless bickering. What good can come from balancing interests... Let's observe and see. It's normal for the industry to feel frustrated, but don't be too hopeless. Washington's drama never ends. Once the return issue is settled, CLARITY will have a chance. The problem is... who is willing to make concessions? It's truly "pause," let's wait and see what happens.
View OriginalReply0
GovernancePretendervip
· 11h ago
The yield issue is stuck, and this time it looks like it will take another half a year to figure out. --- Pause ≠ death. I'm very familiar with Washington's approach; let's wait and see. --- Basically, everyone just wants benefits, and no one is willing to make concessions—typical political tug-of-war. --- SEC and CFTC are unmoving; any other attempts are pointless. --- Uh... if this bill really passes, I’ll need to review the risk model again. --- All parties have a price bottom line. The question is who will compromise first? I bet it won't be so soon. --- Is suspending the hearing actually a good thing? At least it shows negotiations are ongoing; complete shelving would be terrifying. --- What do the leading trading platforms really want? That might be the key to breaking the deadlock. --- The pessimism isn't that heavy; it shows everyone is aware—this isn't over. --- The name CLARITY was chosen, so you know this thing is not clear at all.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter007vip
· 11h ago
Yield rate bottlenecks are really frustrating, but pause ≠ done for, there's still hope this time --- It's the same old story of balancing interests. When will it truly be implemented? --- The key still depends on how the SEC and CFTC position themselves. Without their approval, nothing is worth anything. --- That's how the crypto world is—pausing today, surprises tomorrow. Anyway, I'm still waiting. --- Are the leading trading platforms just stalling? Their efficiency is truly remarkable. --- Industry is disappointed, but people are still watching, which means they're not giving up. That's the real point.
View OriginalReply0
BlockImpostervip
· 12h ago
Profitability issues are a bottleneck, but it's nothing new --- Pause ≠ death, these people are very familiar with their tricks --- Wait, can banks and exchanges really be united on this matter? I can't see it --- The key depends on how the SEC plays it; the CFTC is probably also scheming --- Ha, the so-called "consensus" is just everyone wanting a piece of the cake --- What's there to be frustrated about? It's just a routine negotiation stalemate --- The breakthrough is right in front of us? Ha, I've been hearing that for three years --- It seems that Democratic lawmakers are the real wild card; everything else is just superficial --- From another perspective, the pause actually gives us a chance to breathe and adjust our strategy
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)