I recently came across an annual summary of Opinion, and it was quite interesting.



Last year, when the oracle was contaminated, many projects chose to walk away or shift the blame to users, but Opinion's approach was different—direct compensation. Although this method incurs short-term costs, in the long run, it plays a significant role in maintaining user confidence.

What’s even more noteworthy is their strategic planning for the ecosystem. They are building a comprehensive derivative product matrix around Opinion, allowing the entire ecosystem to expand into more application scenarios and participation methods. This is not just a simple stacking of features but a systematic and logical ecosystem expansion.

An interesting comparison is that some similar projects have gradually evolved into pure casino models, while Opinion is taking a different path—steady and solid, with its own tactics. This differentiated strategy tends to highlight its value more clearly in a bear market.

In this year's outlook, these ideas are still being deepened, with ongoing ecosystem development and product innovation. User retention and project sustainability are often built step by step through such efforts.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ForumLurkervip
· 12h ago
The direct compensation wave was indeed impressive; other projects have long run away and shifted blame. How much courage does it take to operate like that? The ecosystem matrix is playing it well, but it depends on how they execute later. Don't let it turn into just talk on paper again. Compared to those projects that have become nothing but casinos, we're definitely more clear-headed. Let's see how long they can last. Such conscientious practices are rare in a bear market. Long-term is the true winner.
View OriginalReply0
Liquidated_Larryvip
· 12h ago
Compensation is indeed tough, unlike some projects that pass the buck in a disgusting way. --- The ecological matrix sounds good, but I'm just worried it's another empty promise. --- Projects still building during the bear market, at least shows people haven't left yet, which is worth noting. --- Most similar projects have turned into casinos, so Opinion's move actually seems rare. --- If the oracle really paid out, its reputation would definitely be stronger than just talking. --- Haha, gradually accumulating? I just want to see how far this can go. --- Differentiated strategies sound good, but I wonder how long the bear market can last. --- Derivative product matrix, another matrix... probably the same old trick. --- Short-term has costs, long-term has benefits—this logic is quite rare in the crypto world.
View OriginalReply0
FallingLeafvip
· 12h ago
Compensation definitely boosts confidence, but we all know that the real test is the next step. Paying out directly, wow, that takes a lot of determination... But on the other hand, in the long run, that's the right path. The ecosystem matrix concept is interesting, just worried about its sustainability. Similar projects are now almost like casinos; Opinion is considered a rare clean stream. Steady and reliable? Not many projects can operate like this in a bear market. The biggest fear is just talk; hopefully this time it's not just empty promises. Retention rate is truly a touchstone; let's see how far it can go this year. Daring to pay out directly, such boldness is rare in the crypto world, thumbs up. The ecological plan sounds good, but ultimately it depends on whether it can survive. Not chasing the hot trends, I would like to see more projects like this.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTherapistvip
· 12h ago
Wow, this is truly a project with integrity. The direct compensation approach is really impressive. There are plenty of casino-style projects, but the steady approach of Opinion looks more comfortable. The ecosystem matrix gameplay is quite solid, not just hype. Those who can persist in building during a bear market will see the difference when the bull market arrives. This is what sustainable development really means. Other projects should learn from it.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaskedvip
· 12h ago
The operation of direct compensation really gave me a good impression. Unlike some projects that keep shifting blame, this is the true long-term attitude. The ecosystem matrix strategy still has some substance; it's far better than those projects that have turned into casinos. In a bear market, you can actually see who is truly working and who is just making empty promises. The progress of Opinion over the past year has indeed been steady. The wave of compensating users shows that the team still has a conscience, which is really rare in the crypto world. I feel like they are taking a different path, not following the trend or being aggressive. This style may not stand out in a bull market, but it’s in a bear market that true character is revealed. They’ve compensated users? That would make headlines in the crypto world, showing how bad other projects are. The entire ecosystem plan looks promising; it’s not the kind of scheme where they launch a meme coin today and run away tomorrow.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)