The halving cycle remains a powerful force shaping Bitcoin's trajectory. Those dismissing the 4-year pattern clearly haven't studied the historical data closely enough. The chart tells the story—predictable booms and busts mapped directly to network events. Whether you're a believer or skeptic, the evidence keeps stacking up. The cycle isn't dead; most traders just aren't reading the signals correctly.

BTC2.92%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
token_therapistvip
· 3h ago
The four-year cycle sounds plausible, but those who truly make money never rely solely on charts.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMelonWatchervip
· 3h ago
Haha, they're starting to hype the halving cycle again. I just want to ask, are we going to get cut again this time?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationSurvivorvip
· 3h ago
Is anyone still denying the four-year cycle? Ha, that just means they haven't seriously looked at the candlestick charts.
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_whisperervip
· 3h ago
I've already mastered the halving cycle theory long ago. If someone is still hyping it up now, they probably haven't bought the dip yet.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-5854de8bvip
· 4h ago
The halving cycle theory has really been somewhat overhyped; every time, someone believes in it wholeheartedly, only to be proven wrong by the very same group.
View OriginalReply0
ResearchChadButBrokevip
· 4h ago
The Halvening cycle theory has become tiresome, but the data here really proves it wrong.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)