As a long-term observer of the cryptocurrency market, a recent phenomenon worth noting is that the correlation between Bitcoin and gold has fallen to -0.18, which is a clear market divergence signal.



Looking back at historical data, whenever these two asset classes shift from high correlation to divergence, Bitcoin often experiences significant gains. Major market movements in 2017 and 2021 both began with similar correlation reversals. Gold, as a traditional safe haven, has long been considered a "digital gold," while Bitcoin has evolved into a dual-asset that carries policy expectations and technological innovation.

This timing is indeed worth pondering. The regulatory environment is trending positively, institutional funds continue to flow in, and even sovereign-level large capital is actively deploying. From a market structure perspective, BTC's 30-day volatility has already fallen below that of gold, with 76% of circulating supply being locked for the long term, indicating a market structure that is more stable than ever before.

Some voices warn of high volatility risks, but from a data perspective, Bitcoin's current volatility is actually smaller. Investors who are waiting when the correlation is positive now face an obvious choice—continue to wait or re-evaluate the opportunities of this cycle.

History does not simply repeat itself, but the market rhythm often resembles itself. If this trend, initiated by the negative correlation, indeed holds, missing it may mean waiting for the next four-year cycle.
BTC3.14%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HallucinationGrowervip
· 6h ago
The shift to negative correlation... feels like one of those technical setups that look great on the surface, but then unexpectedly reverse when you least expect it. Can't quite get a handle on it, everyone. Is institutional entry reliable, or are we just going to get cut again? Let's wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
LayoffMinervip
· 7h ago
Damn, is -0.18 really the number? Feels like this wave is about to take off --- Wait, 76% locked? Doesn't that mean fewer and fewer chips are available --- History repeats itself many times, but the key is whether this time will be another scam to cut the leeks --- Institutional entry sounds good, but aren't they just using our money to gamble --- Damn, last year I didn't buy in when the correlation was positive, and now I have to watch others make money again --- Low volatility below gold is indeed crazy, feels like something is about to explode --- So should I go all-in now or keep hiding? That's the real question --- 2017 and 2021 both crashed once, why wouldn't this time be different --- Sovereign-level funds? Just listen, don't take it seriously --- Next four-year cycle, I still need to survive; let's just get through this winter first
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCriervip
· 7h ago
No, the -0.18 data really needs to be taken seriously. The last time I saw this signal was before 2021... feels like this time is different.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)