When it comes to RWA, nine out of ten projects are just talking big. But have you noticed? What about those traditional institutions that truly hold assets? Most are still hanging around the entrance—not because they don’t want to play, but because they’re scared. Scared of what? Once connected to blockchain, regulators will be on you in minutes, exposing company data without mercy, transaction speeds will be a mess, and they simply can’t integrate with traditional systems. These worries, instead, have become a breakthrough opportunity for some projects.



Take Dusk as an example. Many think it’s just a Layer 1, but if you really delve into its design philosophy, you’ll find this chain is almost tailor-made for "regulated financial scenarios." While other chains focus on stacking TPS, they are researching how to embed rules like EU MiCA and securities clearing and settlement directly into the protocol itself. This is called "compliance as code," not just patchwork later on, but built into the architecture from the start, allowing institutions to operate with confidence.

One example particularly illustrates the point. Their joint project with the Dutch securities exchange NPEX, DuskTrade, is launching next year. It’s not just about putting assets on-chain; it automates the entire process from issuance of equity and bonds, trading, to dividends, all on the chain, while complying with EU securities law. In the future, financing for small and medium-sized enterprises through equity tokens might be as simple as issuing a token—yet behind this token is real, legally recognized equity with actual money backing it. Compared to projects that are always shouting about a "trillion-dollar market," this is the real deal.

On the technical side, there’s also some interesting stuff. They are about to launch their mainnet DuskEVM, claiming to be the world’s first ZK-friendly EVM chain. In other words, developers can continue writing contracts in familiar Solidity, but the chain will automatically handle privacy layers—an ideal solution. For financial scenarios, this isn’t just a cherry on top; it genuinely solves real problems.
DUSK-13.3%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ChainMaskedRidervip
· 4h ago
Bro, Dusk's "compliance as code" approach is truly brilliant. Compared to those who boast about trillion-dollar markets every day, this actually addresses real problems. Nine out of ten RWA projects are just talk, but this one is actually doing the work. NPEX teaming up with DuskTrade to open next year—can equity financing really be as simple as issuing tokens? That's interesting, let's see if it can be implemented. Honestly, the ZK-friendly EVM chain is a good selling point, but whether developers will really buy into it depends on the operations. Compliance + privacy + financial scenarios... on paper, it's perfect, but I'm worried that in practice it might still be the same old story. Regulators watching you, data leaks, system lag—these are the nightmares of traditional institutions. If Dusk can truly break through these issues, it will be more than just Layer 1. What does DuskEVM compare to? Honestly, I'm curious how they manage to balance privacy and compliance simultaneously. In the RWA space, it still depends on who can really bring institutions onboard. No matter how much you boast, without users, it's all pointless.
View OriginalReply0
MissedTheBoatvip
· 4h ago
Compliance as code sounds good, but will NPEX really open next year... it's a bit uncertain. --- There are indeed many hype projects, but Dusk's approach of considering regulation from the architecture stage is finally somewhat unique. --- ZK-friendly EVM, sounds good, but is it really stable when running? --- Tokenizing equity sounds tempting, do traditional institutions really believe in this? The key still depends on regulatory attitude. --- While others are stacking TPS, they are thinking about how to make the big boss feel at ease using it. This is indeed a tricky point. --- If the collaboration with the Dutch exchange really materializes, that would be real skill. It's still too early to say anything now.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictimvip
· 4h ago
Hey, wait a minute. Is it confirmed that NPEX will open next year? It feels a bit too idealistic.
View OriginalReply0
LayerHoppervip
· 4h ago
Incorporating compliance into the code? Sounds good, but does NPEX really trust on-chain clearing and settlement, or is it just another PR stunt?
View OriginalReply0
SerLiquidatedvip
· 4h ago
Alright, this time I finally see someone explaining RWA clearly. Other projects are really just stacking concepts; Dusk's approach of "compliance as code" does have some substance. Wait, can DuskTrade really go live next year? If it's stable, traditional institutions will inevitably come to take over. Writing compliance into the protocol sounds easy to say but hard to do. Can it really be implemented smoothly? But on the other hand, the combination of ZK+EVM is still a scarce commodity. If privacy processing truly becomes automated, the finance sector will definitely need this. The RWA market is just waiting for this kind of infrastructure. The nine projects mentioned earlier should reflect on themselves. Is the mainnet launch date set? It feels more reliable than what's stated in the official documentation.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)