The governance layer faces a fundamental control problem. It doesn't even manage its own token contract—only the Foundation holds that authority. When it comes to proposals, again, the Foundation acts as the sole gatekeeper.



This isn't decentralization; it's the opposite. Power keeps concentrating rather than distributing. Real governance should mean the community can actually push back, but right now they can't. There's no meaningful mechanism to hold Labs or the Foundation accountable. That's the core issue.

If this pattern continues, governance becomes just a façade—the illusion of control without the actual substance.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquiditySurfervip
· 4h ago
In plain terms, it's about hiding centralization behind the guise of decentralization, with the foundation having absolute control.
View OriginalReply0
shadowy_supercodervip
· 4h ago
It's that same old trick of the foundation calling the shots and the community can't check in. It just sounds like pretending to decentralize.
View OriginalReply0
ChainBrainvip
· 4h ago
It's the same old game again. Foundation makes the rules, and the community is just a decoration.
View OriginalReply0
VirtualRichDreamvip
· 4h ago
Basically, it's just a change of packaging without changing the medicine. Foundation holds all the power, right?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)