2026-01-03 11:22:03

Regarding the future direction of MYX, I have outlined three most likely scenarios. The first is a decline under high resistance, ending this wave of market movement; the second is a direct upward breakthrough, leveraging the funding rate advantage for a rapid surge; the third is a period of high-level consolidation to build momentum, followed by a subsequent upward move.

I personally lean towards the third scenario, but honestly, market changes are too rapid, and these are just speculations based on the current technical patterns. What do you think? Share your thoughts in the comments, or are there other possibilities I might have missed? Let's discuss the next 20 hours of MYX's movement together.

MYX-11.31%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenRationEater

· 01-03 12:41

The third option is the most stable, but I prefer to bet on the funding rate taking off directly. Wait, can 20 hours change your fate? That seems a bit optimistic, haha. I agree with the idea of high-level oscillation; the cost line must be maintained. Honestly, looking at technical patterns is like reading fortunes; it all depends on luck. This time, the funding rate has indeed been maintained quite well, but before taking off, you usually need a surge. I lean towards a mixed approach of two and three, first shaking out the traders before a rally. I agree with the third option, but we need to watch out for the possibility of a sudden plunge. Anything is possible, how to be sure... the market is too much of a black box. The funding rate staying this high will eventually release energy.

View OriginalReply0

liquidation_surfer

· 01-03 11:51

The idea of oscillating and accumulating power, I've heard it too many times, but it still ends up crashing directly? Bet on the second one; a quick surge aligns better with this wave's temperament. High-level resistance is nonsense; the key is whether the funding rate can hold up. Choose one of three... I think there's a fourth possibility, which is that none of them are correct haha. The third option sounds the most stable, but who knows what will happen within 20 hours. Oscillating and accumulating power is usually a pretext before a decline, be cautious. With such a high funding rate, a quick breakout is definitely needed, or a wave of liquidations will come. I think it will test repeatedly at high levels, but ultimately break through.

View OriginalReply0

FlippedSignal

· 01-03 11:50

I agree with the idea of oscillation and accumulation, but it's really hard to say what can happen in these 20 hours. It's been at a high level for so long, and it could crash down at any moment. Betting on the first scenario isn't foolish either. The third option sounds the most comfortable, but the most comfortable scenarios are often the hardest to realize, don't you think? The capital rate does have an advantage here, but this thing changes too quickly, making it really hard to predict. I lean towards the second option—breaking through directly and decisively, no more hesitation. It feels like there are too many possibilities for missing out; the market is much more complex than we think. The third option is safe but inefficient; the second is aggressive but risky. This is a game of strategy. The idea of oscillation and accumulation is a bit optimistic; market sentiment may not cooperate.

View OriginalReply0

HalfBuddhaMoney

· 01-03 11:23

I've heard the whole oscillation and accumulation routine too many times, and it all ended in collapse haha Bet for 20 hours? I bet it’s nothing It seems you missed the fourth possibility: sideways trading until it’s dead boring The advantage of capital ratio is unreliable; just go against it if you want to The third option sounds the safest, so it’s most likely not to follow that path

View OriginalReply0

YouKMaster

· 01-03 11:22

I suspect you shorted 😅.

View OriginalReply0