People who read Sei's 2025 annual report often have the first reaction — another public chain performance report. Faster speed? Parallel EVM support? Parameter optimization? That's all there is.



But if you only focus on these metrics, you might miss the most important thing.

What’s truly interesting about Sei is not "faster," but doing something very counterintuitive. In 2025, its three strategic directions are not about traditional performance competition.

From a different perspective, Sei's logic is: not about who is the fastest, but about who is the most seamless to use. That’s the real long-term competitiveness.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainDecodervip
· 01-05 12:18
According to research, this article touches on a key point that is often overlooked— from a technical perspective, performance metrics themselves often become a narrative trap. It is worth noting that the shift of projects like Sei from "throughput competition" to "user experience competition" actually implies a paradigm shift in the entire public chain track. Data shows that most projects are still stuck in a single-dimensional arms race. What are the three specific directions to consider deeply? And how can we quantify this seemingly vague competitive dimension of "most user-friendly"?
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizervip
· 01-05 07:11
Alright, that’s somewhat interesting... but the phrase "most smooth to use" sounds a bit empty. --- Another performance report? Same old story. What I really want to see is how it keeps the ecosystem sticky. --- Compared to who’s fastest vs. who’s smoothest... I respect that logic. Too many chains just boast about TPS numbers. --- So Sei has accepted its fate? Giving up speed competition and shifting focus to user experience? --- Looks like Solana’s approach has been played out. Sei wants to differentiate... but the problem is users still only look at the numbers. --- "Counterintuitive"? I just want to know how much the user experience can really differ, not just surface-level data. --- Finally, a chain that gets it. Excessive performance but a cold ecosystem—that’s the real problem. --- No longer boasting about being the fastest, now about being the smoothest... it’s definitely time to change the routine.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWizardvip
· 01-03 10:55
To be honest, I'm already tired of the performance data. Sei's recent shift towards user experience is indeed interesting, but how long it can last remains to be seen. Another storyteller; what really retains people is whether there are useful things in the ecosystem. Even with high TPS, poor user experience is pointless. If Sei can truly master this aspect, they might be able to break through. Wait, "not the fastest but the smoothest"? That sounds like Solana has been a bit exhausted from being beaten, haha. But on the other hand, in the long run, user stickiness is indeed much more important than raw performance. I'm just worried that it's all just on paper, and the actual implementation remains the same old story.
View OriginalReply0
tokenomics_truthervip
· 01-03 10:51
Honestly, just another "We're fast" story. Wait... which phrasing feels most natural? This angle is indeed something I haven't seen before. Sei's move is about positioning the ecosystem rather than just speed, there's some substance to it. Is it meaningful to compare TPS every day? Ultimately, it's about retaining users. But what exactly are these three directions? Just hearing concepts feels a bit vague. UX is more important than performance; it should have been played this way long ago. Forget it, let's see how things look by the end of 2025. Right now, all the hype doesn't really matter.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-44a00d6cvip
· 01-03 10:45
Well, it sounds nice, but in the end, it's still about TPS... Hmm, wait, actually, it does seem interesting. The phrase "most smooth to use" is much more reliable than just stacking parameters. This is true differentiation; otherwise, it would just be Solana's approach all over again.
View OriginalReply0
RooftopVIPvip
· 01-03 10:41
Hey, wait a minute. I like Sei's logic. Comparing speed and comfort, this really is a long-term perspective. --- Another performance report? Wake up, they’re not playing that game anymore. --- Most smooth to use vs fastest, these two are worlds apart. Most people haven't even realized it yet. --- Honestly, this angle is fresh, but has it been implemented? Don’t just make empty promises again. --- Something's off. What exactly are the three directions? Just talking about concepts is pointless. --- Finally, a public chain has figured out this issue. Others are still fighting over TPS. --- Huh? What does "most smooth to use" mean? Can you give some real feedback or is it just marketing talk? --- I don’t buy it. Let’s see how Sei becomes the "most smooth." --- Performance is no longer the bottleneck, actually. It’s the ecosystem. Does Sei understand this?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)