Having traded derivatives for many years, I've seen countless people get liquidated overnight, and also a few who become more stable over time. Later, I realized that people who lose money often fall into the same trap—completely failing to understand the relationship between leverage and position size.



**It's not that high leverage will kill you, it's that you don't know how to manage your position**

Many people get scared when they hear about 100x leverage, but that's actually a false problem. You can open a position with 100x leverage but only invest 1% of your total funds; the actual risk is no different than investing 1% of your capital with 1x leverage. Remember the core formula: Actual risk = Leverage multiple × Position size ratio. That’s the key.

**Stop-loss is life-saving; learn from the blood and tears of 2024**

During last year's market crash, the data was quite shocking: 78% of liquidated traders were actually holding on despite losing 5%, eventually getting caught and liquidated. My trading discipline is firm—never risk more than 2% of your principal on a single trade. Once that limit is reached, stop trading for the day. Many think this is too conservative, but in the long run, staying alive is what makes you a winner.

**Calculate your numbers before opening a position**

This is a simple calculation: Investable amount ≤ (Principal × 2%) ÷ (Stop-loss ratio × Leverage).

For example: If you have 50,000 yuan, and your maximum acceptable loss is 1,000 yuan (2% of principal), and you plan to use 10x leverage, then the maximum single trade amount is 5,000 yuan. Even if you hit the stop-loss, your loss is limited to 1,000 yuan. It seems conservative, but this stability adds up over a year or two.

**Take profits in stages, don’t go all-in at once**

When you gain 20%, sell one-third of your position, then hold the remaining. When you reach 50%, sell another third. For the final position, set a simple rule, such as closing everything if the price drops below the 5-day moving average. In 2024, some traders used this logic, turning 50,000 yuan into 1 million. Not because of luck, but because of discipline.

**Use small amounts to hedge risks**

If you hold a position, buy put options with 1% of your total capital to hedge against sudden black swan events. During the unexpected crash in 2024, this move protected nearly a quarter of your capital. The cost isn’t high, but it can save your life at critical moments.

**Mathematics reveals the truth about long-term profitability**

The ultimate profit formula in trading is straightforward: (Win rate × Average profit per trade) – (Loss rate × Average loss per trade). Suppose you risk a maximum of 2% per trade and aim to exit at 20% profit; even with a win rate of only 34%, you can still make money in the long run. Many people think their win rate is too low and give up, but they don’t understand this logic.

**These four rules should be etched in your mind**

First, the maximum loss per trade should be 2% of your principal—this is the bottom line. Second, limit your trading to no more than 20 times a year; it’s better to do less than to trade recklessly. Third, your profits should be at least three times your losses to beat the annual market. Fourth, spend 70% of your time observing, and only 30% actually trading.

Many think this approach is too conservative and inefficient. But if you’ve seen enough liquidation cases, you’ll understand—staying alive and making stable profits is far more valuable than getting rich overnight.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RugpullSurvivorvip
· 01-05 19:30
This is what I want to hear, not those deceptive claims of 10x or 100x returns. Wait, can a 2% stop loss really be achieved? Why do I always fail to hold on? Are the cases from 50,000 to 1 million real? It's a bit suspicious. The key is execution. It's easy to say but extremely difficult to do. My biggest fear is black swan events. Trying options is definitely worth a shot. 70% on the sidelines is too uncomfortable, feels like wasting time. 20 trades a year? I do more than that in a week. That's true, but the problem is most people simply can't control themselves. This logic is actually about losing less and earning more. It sounds simple but is actually difficult. Making money while alive is indeed more realistic than getting rich overnight. I only understand this after experiencing losses.
View OriginalReply0
CrashHotlinevip
· 01-05 07:10
That's quite right, but most people simply can't follow this discipline Really, the stop-loss threshold has stopped many people The 2% line sounds simple, but one loss makes your hand tremble, and you can't stick to it In the case of going from 50,000 to 1,000,000, I believe it, but more people turn 50,000 into 5,000 The key is still mentality; math isn't the problem, human nature is 100x leverage isn't scary; what's scary is thinking you can control it Waiting and watching at 70% really is the secret, but no one can stick to it
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainGrillervip
· 01-05 00:29
Damn, this is the truth. I used to be one of those 78% fools, holding on until liquidation. A 2% stop-loss has saved me multiple times. Now I treat it as a religious belief. That's right, being conservative? As long as you're alive, you've won. That's better than anything. This logic should have been followed long ago, saving me a lot of tuition fees. 70% observe, 30% act—sounds simple, but actually doing it is damn hard.
View OriginalReply0
AmateurDAOWatchervip
· 01-03 10:52
Pure mathematical thinking is indeed top-notch, but I’ve only seen fewer than 5 people who can truly stick to a 2% stop-loss. This theory sounds beautiful, but in practice, once you blow up, you forget everything. From 50,000 to 1,000,000, this example is more about survivor bias... but the logic really has no flaws. The key is still mindset; I agree with the 70% observation wait-and-see approach, the remaining 30% are all gamblers. If you really dare to follow a 2% stop-loss, a slow account growth is actually the most comfortable, no need to watch the market explosion every day.
View OriginalReply0
NftDeepBreathervip
· 01-03 10:50
After all these years, I still haven't learned. Living is harder than making money. --- Oh my, I need to stick the 2% stop-loss on the table. --- Everyone is right, but if you can't execute, it's just bullshit. --- 100x leverage really doesn't scare me; what scares me is not having a brain. --- What happened to those people who went from 50,000 to 1 million? Dare to say they continue to be steady? --- Partial take-profit has really saved lives, but most people simply can't wait. --- Spending 70% of the time watching the market and 30% working sounds simple, but the most people die from it. --- I kept the 2% single trade bottom line for three months, but I broke it haha. --- Hearing about black swan hedging sounds smart, but in reality, you have to go through a margin call to truly understand. --- A 34% win rate can still make money; this math is a bit comforting. --- Always talking about doing less, but as soon as I look at the market, I open positions. Who isn't like that?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-26d7f434vip
· 01-03 10:48
Exactly right, the key is self-discipline and execution... I just keep losing money due to frequent trading. --- A 2% stop-loss line really saved me once; otherwise, I would have blown up long ago. --- 100x leverage is not scary; what's scary is betting with the entire position. --- That case from 50,000 to 1,000,000... Really? Can you believe it? --- The 70% wait-and-see attitude hit home; I only lost because I couldn't sit still. --- Write "making money while alive" into the statement, or else how many more people will die. --- After calculating the formula, I realized my previous risk control was just a decoration. --- The most feared thing is stubbornly holding on; the stop-loss line is right there, but I refuse to execute. --- I want to ask, how was this 34% win rate in the theory tested? --- The idea of partial take-profit is good, but having patience is really difficult.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsDetectivevip
· 01-03 10:47
Hey, as I always say, staying alive is more important than anything, isn’t it? --- I’ve been implementing the 2% stop-loss rule for a long time, even though everyone around me says I’m too conservative and stingy haha --- The 100x leverage thing is actually just scary; the core is still position management, no doubt about it --- The example of turning 50,000 into 1,000,000... alright, execution ability is indeed the most scarce thing --- The logic of taking profits in batches—honestly, I’ve seen quite a few people lose because of greed, I know it’s easy to say but hard to do --- Black swan hedging has saved me a few times, but most people simply can’t bring themselves to spend that 1% of money --- A 34% win rate can still be profitable; this math actually shattered many of my stereotypes --- 20 trades a year? I need to kick my itch to trade habit --- 70% watching, 30% acting—easy to say, but really tough to endure --- Those margin calls... nine out of ten are from people who are still holding on after losing 5%
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterXvip
· 01-03 10:38
Damn, it's the same old story, I've heard it a hundred times, but no one can really stick with it Turning 50,000 into 1,000,000? I believe it, but such people are one in ten thousand You're right, but execution is the real hell, most people simply can't wait I've tried the 2% stop-loss, but even with the right mindset, I still get wiped out This theory is perfect, but in reality, there are always surprises and black swans Unwilling to admit it, but living is indeed better than getting wiped out, sounds much better 70% watching? I fear it might turn into 99% spectating and 1% acting The key is no one tells you when to act; everyone is a armchair strategist after the fact
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperervip
· 01-03 10:36
To be honest, I've been using the 2% stop-loss strategy for a long time, but the hardest part is execution. As soon as the account drops by 5%, I want to "wait a bit more"... and you know how that ends. The real money-makers are those who work quietly and ruthlessly, not necessarily geniuses. The most shocking part of this article is the data showing that 78% of people die because they refuse to cut losses... I have too many counterexamples around me. Leverage itself isn't the problem; human nature is. Using 100x leverage with a 1% position size is actually a safety tool, but few people can really do that. I need to tattoo the 70% wait-and-see, 30% act ratio on my brain—20 trades a year... feels like it's even lower than my current frequency haha.
View OriginalReply0
SerumDegenvip
· 01-03 10:24
ngl the 2% rule hits different when you've actually seen the liquidation cascade firsthand... most people read this and think "too conservative" then wonder why they're staring at zero balance 💀
Reply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)