The essence of agent programming (or intuitive programming) is actually similar to many fields that require decision-making based on input to achieve goals. Whether you're trading, playing poker, or interacting with AI, the underlying logic is quite similar—you input some form of information and then receive corresponding feedback and results.



This decision-feedback cycle runs throughout the entire process. In trading, you analyze market data and technical indicators, then decide on buy or sell directions. When playing poker, you judge based on your opponent's habits and probabilities, adjusting your strategy accordingly. When using AI, you carefully craft prompts to guide the model to produce the content you want.

Although these scenarios seem different on the surface, at their core, they are all doing the same thing: processing input information, applying a decision-making mechanism, and producing the desired output. That's why people who understand trading logic can sometimes quickly get started with agent programming—the thinking framework is actually interconnected.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingerPrivateKeyvip
· 01-06 07:06
Really, this analogy is spot on. When I was trading cryptocurrencies before, I used this same logic. Now, writing an Agent, I'm just applying that same approach directly.
View OriginalReply0
tokenomics_truthervip
· 01-05 17:05
Wow, this analogy is spot on. When I was trading cryptocurrencies before, it was the same logic, and now writing agents feels the same.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterKingvip
· 01-04 06:43
Bro, I get this logic. Basically, it's a vicious cycle of investment and feedback. Our wool-harvesting strategy is actually the same approach: first scan the contract interactions to accumulate engagement, then wait for the project team to respond with the qualification for empty investment. The framework is indeed the same.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c802f0e8vip
· 01-04 02:59
Well, looking at it this way, it's actually just a feedback loop that can be applied anywhere.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeNomadvip
· 01-03 09:52
ngl this whole decision-loop framework hits different when you've watched routing algorithms fail spectacularly... seen traders dump their agent prompts like they're hot after a slippage blowup, trust assumptions collapse faster than a poorly audited bridge contract tbh
Reply0
StopLossMastervip
· 01-03 09:49
This logic is indeed insightful, but to put it simply, it's garbage in, garbage out, right? No matter how clever the AI is, a poorly written prompt is useless.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetectiveBingvip
· 01-03 09:41
This logic indeed makes sense, but to be honest, I've already known the principles of trading for a long time. I'm actually still exploring how to use AI—how to adjust prompts so that it truly understands my intentions. That's the real challenge, right?
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHobovip
· 01-03 09:38
Wow, this analogy is brilliant. It feels like my poker mindset can directly be applied to Agent... It's really just a matter of changing the name and the scene.
View OriginalReply0
FUDwatchervip
· 01-03 09:37
This logic is truly brilliant. To put it simply, it's the information -> decision -> feedback cycle; changing the surface doesn't change the core.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanPrincevip
· 01-03 09:37
Yeah, this logic is indeed quite interesting and makes sense. It's basically a feedback loop; just change the skin and it can be used. Wait, does that mean people who lose money trading stocks are also prone to messing up with Agents... By the way, those who understand this system are indeed in high demand, but how many can actually execute it properly? Bro, you've explained this in plain language, no wonder you're so good at it. It feels like teaching someone to fish versus just giving them a fish; once the principle is understood, it becomes simple. So essentially, it's just garbage in, garbage out. Honestly, this is much more comfortable than those serious articles about Agents.
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)