Gold has shimmered brightly throughout history, reflecting the brilliance of power. Code beats in the digital world, weaving the dreams of a new era. This is a contest between carbon-based and silicon-based life, a confrontation between the past and the future at the hall of value.

Standing at this pivotal moment in time, we witness a transfer of power in the realm of "safe-haven" assets. Gold's advantages are clear: it resides in central bank vaults, plays a role in geopolitical games, and its stable purchasing power protects assets from being swallowed by real-world volatility. It is the last fortress amid trade wars and debt crises.

But then, Bitcoin arrives. No physical form, no borders, and unreviewable—these features position it as a "digital scarcity" comparable to gold's millennia-long status. Most importantly, as Bitcoin's correlation with Nasdaq gradually loosens and it begins to follow global capital flows, it is no longer purely a speculative asset. Its supply rigidity even surpasses gold, and under leverage, it pre-commits trust for the future, often sharper when hedging extreme risks.

However, the reality is that gold remains steady as a mountain, calm and unshaken. Bitcoin still swings between "risk and safe-haven," with volatility as restless as a newborn's heartbeat, causing conservative investors to hesitate. In the face of extreme black swan events, gold is a shield, while Bitcoin is more like an adventure.

Gold preserves the warmth of the past; Bitcoin explores the boundaries of tomorrow. This is not about substitution or extinction, but an upgrade in human understanding of trust—both are needed.