🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
Let's consider an interesting hypothetical—what if you had 377 million yuan in capital at that time and faced a choice of asset allocation? What would be the outcome of choosing different directions?
First, let's look at the gold route. In 2014, gold prices fluctuated around 220 to 270 yuan per gram. If all of it was used to buy gold, based on the prices at that time and comparing to current gold prices, the returns would have at least quadrupled. 377 million yuan could have grown to nearly 1.5 billion. For a company with liabilities exceeding 2.2 billion yuan, this wouldn't solve all problems, but it would at least allow a breather, providing time and space to adjust strategies and address structural crises.
But that's not the most exciting part.
What if, at that time, the choice was Bitcoin or other crypto assets? From 2014 to now, what is the return on this path? Bitcoin has risen from a few thousand yuan to over a hundred thousand yuan, experiencing countless turbulent market cycles along the way. From another perspective, this is why some investors are still weighing the opportunity cost of early crypto asset investments.
Asset allocation is not just a numbers game. It reflects understanding of risk, market cycles, and long-term value judgment. Choosing gold is conservative, choosing crypto assets is aggressive—but being aggressive often brings unexpected returns.