2025-12-29 02:23:50

The design logic of FIST is quite interesting. With a total supply of 1 billion tokens, 222 million have been burned, leaving 778 million in market circulation. The trading volume generated 163.47 BNB into the pool, and currently, there are still 45.27 BNB sitting in the pool.

The key point is here—the transaction rebate mechanism continuously inflates the bottom pool. The transaction fees from each trade are funneled back into the liquidity pool, creating a self-reinforcing cycle. What does this mean? The support at the bottom is constantly strengthening, and the downward price movement is effectively locked.

Wait, there's more—here's a detail. Some platforms (like trading platforms similar to FOURmeme) also direct their BNB rebates into the same pool. Multiple fund inflows converge into one place, and liquidity is not decreasing but accumulating. From this perspective, breaking through the bottom pool is almost a pseudo-issue.

BNB-0.66%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MoneyBurner

· 9h ago

Oh, I love the logic of liquidity locking; the bottom can't be broken through at all. Wait, 45 BNB is still lying in the pool? Isn't that just waiting for me to build a position? On-chain data is displayed here, multiple entry points converging is indeed powerful, gotta track it personally. This design has some substance, but be cautious of fake breakouts before a pump, you'll understand after being trapped once. Self-reinforcing cycles sound great, but I'm worried it might be a carefully designed harvesting mechanism. Strong bottom support ≠ won't go to zero; I've seen this logic too many times, better to be cautious. Liquidity accumulation = price moat? I bet this wave can break the bottom, not believing in evil.

View OriginalReply0

just_here_for_vibes

· 9h ago

Bro, I have to say this mechanism is pretty aggressive. Self-looping is indeed absolute. Wait, you said breaking through the bottom pool is a false proposition? What if a big whale really dumps? The logic is beautiful, but it still depends on how the subsequent entry volume looks. There are so many BNB lying in the pool, can it really keep the price trapped forever? I have some doubts. The refund mechanism is indeed fierce, but the ecosystem still needs popularity to support it. Basically, it's using transaction fees to pile up at the bottom, which sounds a bit like a Ponzi scheme. I don't really trust this kind of self-reinforcement. I always feel it might reverse and blow up someday.

View OriginalReply0

FUD_Vaccinated

· 9h ago

With such a thick liquidity pool, could it be another myth of "never breaking the bottom"? --- Wait, fee backflow + multi-platform convergence... this logic does have some substance, no wonder they dare to boast like that --- Alright, let's just pretend it can't break through. After all, I've seen too many "impossible" things become possible in the end --- This return mechanism sounds pretty perfect, but I don't know how deep the actual liquidity is; surface numbers can be deceiving --- Multiple funding sources into one pool, sounds like setting a trap for oneself, betting on continuous influx of newcomers

View OriginalReply0

AllInAlice

· 9h ago

Your analysis can't hold up anymore. The pool is indeed stacking up, but can it really lock in the downward space? I don't believe you. --- Wait a minute, this fee return logic... feels like the perpetual motion machine illusion in the crypto world is back again. --- Multiple capital inflow points converging sounds impressive, but is anyone really throwing money in? --- No matter how thick the pool is stacked, it can't withstand concentrated selling pressure. Don't be too superstitious about this mechanism. --- The worst thing isn't breaking through the bottom pool, but that no one is trading and fees drop to zero. --- Wait, are those 45 BNB really safe, or is this just another excuse to cut retail investors in the internal market? --- Self-reinforcing cycle... sounds like pyramid scheme brainwashing, but the charts do look good, so whatever. --- The idea of liquidity accumulation—why do I feel like it's just paving the way for a dump in the future?

View OriginalReply0

SandwichDetector

· 10h ago

Hmm, this design has some substance, with the fee recycling pool reinforcing itself in a cycle. Is the bottom really locked in? It still depends on whether big players will buy in later. Multiple capital entrances are converging, and liquidity is indeed accumulating. The logic checks out. Wait, is the 2.22 billion destroyed actually real or... There are over 45 BNB lying in the pool. Is this the bottom guarantee? That's interesting. Based on this, it indeed can't be broken through, but the premise is that funds are truly flowing in continuously.

View OriginalReply0