Recently discovered something interesting—Falcon Finance, which is doing something many people want but haven't been able to solve: allowing your assets to be safely held while also being instantly usable as cash.



The problem is actually quite common. You’re stacking crypto assets or tokenized real-world assets on-chain, seeking liquidity to seize other opportunities, but liquidation involves slippage and market risk. Their approach this time is different—they’ve built a universal collateral infrastructure that directly issues synthetic USDf through over-collateralization.

How does it work? You deposit your liquid assets, whether digital tokens or tokenized real-world assets. The system values the collateral and directly issues the corresponding USDf. The entire process avoids liquidation; your original assets remain intact, continuing to appreciate if they do, while the newly acquired USDf can be used immediately.

What makes this design smarter than traditional collateralized loans? Standard lending platforms usually restrict asset types, and market volatility can easily trigger forced liquidation. Falcon’s universal approach solves the first problem—supporting multiple asset types, breaking the single-currency limitation. The second issue is addressed through the over-collateralization model, giving your collateralization ratio a buffer, making liquidation less likely to be triggered.

They also didn’t cut corners on risk control. USDf is backed by multiple layers of collateral, and the smart contracts have undergone audits. Asset custody follows established security standards, not just promises.

The ecosystem is also expanding. They’re connecting the worlds of pure crypto assets and real-world assets, trying to bridge DeFi and traditional finance. In the future, integrating more fields like cross-chain assets, synthetic assets, and more could greatly expand the scope.

Community feedback indicates users are responding well to this no-liquidation liquidity solution. Without the fear of being liquidated, it frees up some operational space for users. You can allocate funds more flexibly, avoiding the need to sell core assets outright, while still gaining immediate liquidity.

From a broader perspective, this model is an innovative direction in DeFi. It addresses the contradiction between liquidity and asset holding—whereas before you could only choose one, now you might truly have both. If executed well, such protocols could become foundational infrastructure for on-chain asset management.

Of course, every approach has its risk boundaries. Over-collateralization provides a buffer, but extreme market conditions still require attention. Overall, the idea is correct—making financial tools more user-friendly and lowering participation barriers is what DeFi truly aims to solve.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FOMOSapienvip
· 7h ago
It sounds like a modified version of MakerDAO's approach, but multi-asset support is indeed attractive. However, over-collateralization still depends on extreme market conditions, so avoid a crash. If Falcon can truly connect RWA and crypto, the potential is indeed huge. Let's wait until I actually try it before commenting; for now, I'm just observing. This model, for me, is basically about wanting asset appreciation while also extracting liquidity. It sounds too perfect, which actually makes me a bit cautious.
View OriginalReply0
Token_Sherpavip
· 7h ago
ngl, the overcollateralization buffer sounds nice until we hit a 90% flash crash scenario... then what
Reply0
New_Ser_Ngmivip
· 7h ago
Sounds good, but I'm worried about whether the over-collateralization can hold up in extreme market conditions. --- The fact that no liquidation is required truly addresses a pain point, making it better than traditional platforms. --- I like the Falcon approach; finally someone thought of connecting the two worlds. --- Multi-asset collateralization is easy to say, but the key is whether the auditing and custody are reliable. --- Huh? It sounds nice, but I want to know what the actual user data looks like. --- Liquidity and holding don't have to be mutually exclusive. If it can truly operate stably, that's impressive. --- It's good that risk control isn't lazy, but what exactly does "established safety standards" refer to? --- It feels a bit too idealistic. Let's see how it performs in extreme market conditions first. --- I need to see the audit report for the synthetic USD part; otherwise, I wouldn't dare to get on board. --- Universal collateral sounds appealing, but could it actually increase risk in practice?
View OriginalReply0
NeverVoteOnDAOvip
· 7h ago
Honestly, the feeling of not being liquidated is indeed satisfying, I have to admit that. But what I care more about is whether this USDf will become just another story of a stablecoin in a death spiral. Still observing, auditing is one thing, but can it really withstand extreme market conditions? Over-collateralization sounds good, but who can guarantee that the buffer is enough? Let's wait until the user base grows; early stages are always promising. This time might really be a breakthrough, solving the dilemma that has been bothering me for a long time. Honestly, it's much better than current designs like Aave, at least no need to watch liquidation orders every day. The risk is always there; no matter how you package it, it can't be changed. The key is whether the subsequent ecosystem can truly connect to real assets; otherwise, it's just a nice toy.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)