2025-12-26 11:27:06

What is the true value of privacy coin projects?

Take Beldex as an example. Their public promotion is not just about transaction privacy. They aim to create a complete privacy ecosystem—chat, internet browsing, identity verification, fund transfers—all with a pre-set, trace-free full-chain solution.

But here’s an interesting question: if they only hide transaction amounts, can it really be called a complete privacy solution?

Looking at their recent AMA sessions, the core logic they repeatedly emphasize is actually one thing: don’t simply understand us as "a coin with transaction privacy." The underlying implication is that the market may not fully understand what they are trying to do.

This repeated clarification itself perhaps precisely highlights the common dilemma faced by privacy track projects—how to help users truly understand the value of privacy, rather than just sticking to the stereotype of "money can be hidden."

BDX-1.52%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PensionDestroyer

· 22m ago

To be honest, privacy coins have been stuck in a cycle of self-redemption. Beldex repeatedly clarifying makes it even more amusing; the more they explain, the more it seems guilty, right?

View OriginalReply0

FOMOSapien

· 2h ago

Repeated clarifications only highlight the issue; users simply don't buy it and still think privacy coins are just tools for "tax evasion."

View OriginalReply0

MetaMuskRat

· 2h ago

To be honest, the privacy coin sector has been demonized. Whenever people hear about it, they immediately think of money laundering. Beldex and others have repeatedly clarified this, which is quite helpless. The integrity of the ecosystem is indeed a selling point, but practical implementation is the key. Just shouting slogans is useless. In fact, no matter how you package it, the ultimate test is whether real users are actually using it. That’s the hard indicator. I’m quite optimistic about their approach, but market education... the road is long and difficult. Privacy itself is not wrong; the key is how to get both regulators and the public to accept it. That’s the real challenge.

View OriginalReply0

LostBetweenChains

· 2h ago

Basically, it's a marketing issue. Users don't really care how complete your ecosystem is; they just want to know if they can transfer funds safely without being tracked. Beldex repeatedly clarifies, but it only makes them seem guilty.

View OriginalReply0

PhantomMiner

· 2h ago

To be honest, the gap between marketing and reality for privacy coins is just too big... Beldex is the same, with extravagant promotions, but users just don't buy it. Repeated clarifications only make it seem more guilty; instead of explaining so much, it's better to directly create something that shows its value. If you ask me, most people only care about "whether they can hide money"; as for the complete ecosystem, it's just talk. This industry really needs to start by educating users, but who has that patience... Privacy value = privacy need; without demand, everything is pointless.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerPrivateKey

· 2h ago

Still selling the privacy dream, no matter how elaborate the words, it can't change the fact that the market is just thinking about "hiding money." Repeated clarifications ≈ guilt, I've seen this trick many times... If it were truly valuable, it would have spoken for itself long ago. A complete ecosystem ≠ users actually using it; most people don't care about these at all.

View OriginalReply0