#美联储回购协议计划 Hyperliquid community voting has been finalized. Yesterday's governance vote passed with an 85% approval rate, deciding to permanently burn approximately 11.07% of the $HYPE circulating supply. The official has confirmed this result.



Token burning is not a new practice in the crypto ecosystem, but burning over 10% of the circulating supply at once? This can indeed change market expectations. Generally speaking, a reduction in circulating supply implies increased scarcity, and with such high community participation and consensus, the long-term sentiment for $HYPE has been truly ignited. From the supply side, this kind of reduction often makes holders feel optimistic—not necessarily that the price will rise, but that this governance approach shows the project and community are seriously considering the token's long-term value.
HYPE1.57%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DeFi_Dad_Jokesvip
· 3h ago
Damn, a one-time burn of 11%. That's a bold move. But an 85% approval rate shows the community has truly reached a consensus, and that's the key.
View OriginalReply0
DataChiefvip
· 3h ago
Wow, 11% burned in one go. The community consensus is really strong; an 85% approval rate directly explains the issue.
View OriginalReply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxivip
· 3h ago
Destroying over 10% of the circulating supply, this move is indeed aggressive, and such high community consensus is quite rare. But will it really increase the price? Let's wait and see. If this wave is just hype, the tactics are still the old tricks. 11%? If it can truly sustain the price, that would be impressive. I believe in Hyperliquid's governance approach, which is much better than some projects. Wait, could this be just a prelude to a K-line scam... An 85% approval rate is indeed quite high; the community's recognition is well done. Destroying ≠ price increase, don't get caught being "cut the leeks," everyone. Real and serious reduction operations, at least the attitude is genuine. With less circulating supply, could liquidity become a problem?
View OriginalReply0
BrokenRugsvip
· 3h ago
11% direct burn, this move is really ruthless, but it depends on how things develop afterward...
View OriginalReply0
SellTheBouncevip
· 3h ago
I've heard the argument about destroying circulating supply too many times. Every time, they say it increases scarcity. But what happens? When there's a rebound, you should sell. Don't be fooled by these governance stories.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt