2025-12-26 08:46:55

Honestly, I am now operating with a conservative approach. Earning 0.3% a day is quite solid, isn't it? Instead of constantly thinking about doubling your investment, it's better to steadily accumulate.

To be honest, just enough for daily expenses is fine. I've long given up on the mentality of getting rich overnight. Most people losing money in the market are greedy and can't wait. On the other hand, those who consistently make small profits every day only realize the power of compound interest after a year.

Some traders keep asking me why I don't take large positions to chase big gains. It's not that I lack the courage; at this stage, I understand more clearly the importance of risk control. 0.3% may seem small, but if you keep accumulating it, over a month, a quarter, or a year, the numbers become quite impressive.

Many people have been struggling in this market for years, only to end up with more losses than gains. Conversely, those who don't seek excitement and focus on steady growth end up living the most comfortable lives.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

New_Ser_Ngmi

· 4h ago

Bro, I've heard this set of arguments too many times. The question is, can you stick with it? Oh, wait, indeed, those who are cautious laugh last, I respect that. 0.3% daily compound interest, just over 100% in a year, don't overhype it as something miraculous. Basically, it's a mindset issue; most people simply can't endure to that point. I've tried both heavy positions that multiply tenfold and stable 0.3%, and they are truly different. What I worry about is that this cautious strategy could be wiped out by a black swan event. Compounding sounds simple, but how boring must it be to actually execute? Anyway, I can't stick with it. Your approach isn't wrong; it's just that the market is too tempting, making it hard to stay consistently steady. Honestly, I believe you lack the courage to go all-in, but your tone is a bit tough.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiSherpa

· 4h ago

A daily 0.3% may seem insignificant, but with compound interest over a year, it adds up quite nicely. This guy is right. Stability is the best strategy for longevity; most people are still dreaming of doubling their money. It sounds old-fashioned, but it really makes sense. Not chasing excitement is the way to last until the end. 0.3% daily is indeed sufficient; it's much more refreshing than those who get wiped out. In the end, it's still about mindset. Many people lose the most because they are too greedy. The power of continuous compound interest is indeed underestimated; most people can't see it. I support this mindset. The fastest to die in the market are those who want to get rich overnight.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationOracle

· 5h ago

That's right, compound interest is the key. Those who are constantly thinking about tenfold returns every day should wake up. I can accept a 0.3% pace; compared to a high-risk gamble, staying alive is the real winner. That's why I'm still here, even when others get liquidated, I remain. Why talk so much? As long as you make a guaranteed profit with no losses, that's all that matters. Greedy ones are out there delivering vegetables; we'll quietly make small fortunes. Honestly, small profits can be quite terrifying; over a year, it's enough to scare you to death. Risk management—those who understand it live comfortably; those who don't are still gambling.

View OriginalReply0

retroactive_airdrop

· 5h ago

Sounds okay, but is 0.3% really enough? When the market is good, it feels restricted. Compound interest is indeed absolute, but most people simply can't stick with it. Mindset is easy to talk about but hard to practice. Everyone understands risk control, but knowing and doing are two completely different things.

View OriginalReply0