🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
#美联储回购协议计划 December 25th, renowned strategist Michael Saylor discussed the controversial topic of Bitcoin Ordinals in a crypto-themed interview show.
Saylor's stance is very clear: ordinals are indeed a polarizing issue, but he emphasizes that the true competitiveness of this chain lies in the stability of the Bitcoin protocol itself. He supports users having the freedom to operate on the Bitcoin network, including applications like inscribing ordinals — but with a major premise: the underlying protocol must never be modified or new features added just for these functionalities.
In other words, Saylor neither supports censoring ordinals nor advocates protocol upgrades to accommodate them. His core logic is: $BTC 's fundamental value lies in its integrity and security as a monetary medium, not in pursuing flashy features.
In his view, the market should decide what is valuable and what isn't. Good ideas will naturally prevail, bad ones will be eliminated without human intervention. The Bitcoin network should be inclusive enough to accommodate major players like government agencies, while also leaving room for individual investors. This balanced ecological approach may be more worth considering than simply stacking features.