🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
TradingBaseAI Column | Navigating Cycles Instead of Betting on Directions: The Long-term Survival Logic of AI Quantitative Trading
In the market, many people understand investing as one thing: Betting on the right direction.
But truly long-lasting systems often do not rely on “direction judgment,” but on whether they can persist across different cycles.
Bull markets, bear markets, consolidation periods, extreme volatility… Cycles will inevitably change, and the only thing that can be chosen is the response method.
The most overestimated ability in the market is “judging the direction.”
The reason is simple: Direction judgment has strong short-term feedback, compelling stories, and emotional stimulation.
But from a long-term perspective, direction judgment often brings three risks:
A correct judgment can easily lead to increased position size
A misjudgment can destroy years of accumulation
Continuous correct judgments can increase system fragility
Betting on direction essentially amplifies uncertainty.
When designing the quantitative model, TradingBaseAI has a clear premise:
Cycles are unpredictable, but risks can be managed.
Therefore, the system does not aim to be the “most aggressive side” in every market phase, but builds around three long-term issues:
How to reduce ineffective trades when the trend is unclear
How to avoid overexposure in a one-sided market
How to prevent system failure during extreme volatility
This means that TradingBaseAI focuses more on: The system’s performance in the worst-case scenario, rather than the best-case imagination.
Humans are almost destined to distort over time:
Maintaining stable execution over several months is extremely difficult
Emotions, states, and external disturbances all alter decisions
The more critical the moment, the easier it is to break rules
The biggest advantage of AI quantification is time consistency:
The same logic can be executed for 1 day, 100 days, 1000 days
Rules are not temporarily changed due to phase results
Rules are not deviated from due to external noise
TradingBaseAI’s goal is not to “win a market phase,” but to enable the strategy to continuously perform over time.
Compound interest is not a mathematical problem, but an execution issue.
It depends on three premises:
Funds are not destroyed in one blow
Strategies are not frequently overthrown
Systems are not interrupted by emotions
What TradingBaseAI does is not promise returns, but to minimize key risks that could interrupt compound growth.
When the system can exist stably, time will truly become a friend.
Conclusion
The market has never rewarded the “most aggressive judgment者,” but is more likely to reward the systems that last the longest.
When investing shifts from “betting on direction” to “managing risks and continuous execution,” the value of AI quantification truly manifests.
TradingBaseAI has never focused on the next market move, but on how to navigate through the next cycle.