Looking at technical charts and market trends? Tha

Question

TommyTeacher1 · Accepted Answer

Community popularity really doesn't lie. 17.5 million in two hours with 40,000 members, I was stunned.

---

Basically, it's about popularity. K-line charts tend to fail in the long run.

---

Funding votes are the most genuine. Don't just look at technical analysis; community consensus is the key.

---

I now always check Discord activity first; it's more accurate than anything else.

---

Haha, another project sustained by the community. Let's see how long they can keep it up.

---

17.5 million in two hours? This level of popularity is indeed extraordinary. Projects with strong community cohesion are worth a try.

---

I just want to know how many of these 40,000 are truly active, not zombie accounts.

---

Technical analysis is useless; trusting community votes is the right approach. That's correct.

---

Fund flows don't lie, but we should also be cautious of hype bubbles.

---

The number of 40,000 members sounds impressive, but actual activity level is what matters.

AirdropAnxiety · Answer

Community consensus is indeed reliable, but among 40,000 members, it's hard to say how many are genuine interactions versus opportunists.

GweiWatcher · Answer

You're right, the technical analysis is outdated. Watching capital flow is the real truth. Taking half the quota in two hours—that's the market voting with its wallet.

---

A Discord with 40,000 members is indeed impressive. But it depends on activity level; many accounts are zombies. The key is genuine interaction.

---

Community consensus is easy to talk about, but only a few projects can truly sustain it. Capital is honest, popularity is honest, but whether it can be maintained long-term is the real test.

---

I've seen too many projects with explosive early popularity, only for the team to run away later. Capital flow may be honest, but if the direction is wrong, it still ends in failure.

---

Having 40,000 members on Discord does indicate something, but most of those rushing in now are after short-term gains. Real ecosystem development takes at least half a year to a year to see results.

---

The enthusiasm for grabbing quotas and whether the project can actually succeed are two different things. I've seen too many projects that sell out in two hours and then go to zero in three months.

SmartContractRebel · Answer

Community consensus is real, but among 40,000 people, how many truly know how to hold? It seems like most are just chasing short-term gains.

UncommonNPC · Answer

Community consensus is the real gold and silver; capital flow never lies.

---

Can 40,000 people on Discord really prove anything? It depends on what they are doing; there are plenty of zombie followers.

---

Taking half of the quota in two hours—that's what real market feedback looks like. Who cares about candlestick charts?

---

Honestly, those chart things are pretty meaningless; the key is who is really throwing in money.

---

The assertion that popularity is fundamental is a bit absolute, I've seen many large community projects still fail in the end.

---

Money doesn't lie, that's true. But how many real users are there in a Discord with 40,000 members?

---

That's why I trust community signals more than technical analysis—it's reliable.

---

Alright, you’re right. Just based on the performance of grabbing quotas in two hours, the project team is at least serious.

---

Can the numbers on Discord be inflated? Anyway, I rely on capital flow for my judgment.

---

The true voting power is in the wallet; everything else is nonsense.

Looking at technical charts and market trends? That's all hindsight analysis. What truly determines the project's prospects is what the community ecosystem is doing and how genuine user participation is.

Trending Topics

2025GateYearEndSummary

CryptoMarketMildlyRebounds

GateChristmasVibes

SantaRallyBegins

CreatorETFs

Hot Gate Fun

Pin