The recent market conditions are indeed bizarre. Gold is rising, silver is rising, US stocks are rising, but this guy Bitcoin has been unable to break the 90,000 mark for 7 consecutive days, unable to go up or down.



Looking at the market, question marks fill the screen: what exactly are we waiting for? Is it really to wash out below 80,000, or is there something else at play?

Honestly, this kind of "stalling" market tests people's resolve the most. Buying the dip on the left side? The 85,288 level may not be a stable support, and you have to watch out for the whales suddenly breaking below to 80,888 and then rebounding, making those who buy in the middle of the climb the relay runners on the hillside. Chasing the rally on the right side? You must wait until BTC truly stabilizes at 90,600 before daring to follow through to 94,000, but judging by the current trend, it feels like waiting for a "miracle" that may not come.

I've heard many say "wait for the big whales to move first," but during this waiting process, are your idle funds really just going to sit in your account?

The more uncertain and volatile these ambiguous times are, the more I think of one question: trading is not just about "choosing to go up or down," but also about actively designing the entire asset structure. In uncertainty, allocating some absolutely certain assets is often safer than betting on the right direction.

This is also why many cautious participants are quietly adjusting their positions—shifting some funds into infrastructure assets with high transparency, stable returns, and that are decoupled from market fluctuations. They won't answer questions like "Can BTC surge past 90,000," but they can answer a more practical one: "When the market is stuck, how can your assets avoid being repeatedly eroded by volatility?"

For example, tools like stablecoins, which maintain a constant value and do not fluctuate with the market. One unit always equals one US dollar, backed by over-collateralization and real-time on-chain audits. Regardless of whether Bitcoin is at 85,288 or elsewhere, the purchasing power of stablecoins won't shrink due to market ups and downs. This kind of "certainty" often has more practical significance in uncertain markets than chasing gains or cutting losses.
BTC-0.43%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
WalletDoomsDayvip
· 2025-12-27 07:33
It's the same old spiel again, I'm getting tired of hearing about stablecoins. Wait, does idle funds really have to just sit there? That logic is a bit confusing. BTC stuck at 90,000 is really annoying, but switching to stablecoins just feels like admitting defeat.
View OriginalReply0
NeverPresentvip
· 2025-12-26 03:57
Wait, gold, silver, and US stocks are all rising, but BTC is stuck? This situation is indeed ridiculous. Idle funds lying around are uncomfortable, but now bottom-fishing feels like gambling on the dealer's mood. Instead of waiting for a miracle, it's better to allocate some stablecoins, at least you won't be washed out. Can 85288 really hold steady? I really can't understand this wave. Stablecoins make some sense; at least you don't have to watch the market every day with your heart in your throat.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a606bf0cvip
· 2025-12-24 10:59
Wait, isn't this just advertising for stablecoins? It feels a bit forced.
View OriginalReply0
NonFungibleDegenvip
· 2025-12-24 10:53
ngl ser this 90k cope is getting exhausting... maybe stablecoins actually aren't that boring after all?
Reply0
RuntimeErrorvip
· 2025-12-24 10:50
Wait a minute, isn't this just selling stablecoins? Looks pretty fancy. --- If the wallet gets stuck, it gets stuck. Do you really need a reason to transfer your position? I think that logic is a bit rigid. --- Really, waiting for the market maker to move is less effective than taking action yourself. --- Having idle funds just lying in the account is probably more painful than chasing gains and cutting losses, right? --- The 90,000 threshold is indeed strange, feels like psychological warfare. --- Stablecoins are supposed to be stable? People are betting on volatility returns. This approach sounds a bit dull.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlordvip
· 2025-12-24 10:42
Basically, it's about saving some bullets. Instead of worrying about whether 9 million can break through, it's better to think about what to do with the idle money in your account.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)