Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

Legislators are wrestling with a tough balancing act right now. They want to shield kids from harmful content on social platforms, but here's the catch—how do you do that without crushing free speech? It's messy. Every proposal seems to hit a wall. Too strict? You're censoring. Too loose? Kids stay exposed. Some folks argue this is exactly why decentralized social networks matter. No single authority calling all the shots. But even that comes with trade-offs. The debate isn't settling anytime soon, and honestly, there's no clean answer here.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropworkerZhangvip
· 3h ago
ngl this is a deadlock—if you regulate too strictly, people say it's censorship; if you go too loose, kids end up suffering... Decentralization in Web3 sounds cool, but who will deal with the bad actors?
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetectivevip
· 3h ago
I told you, these legislators have no idea how on-chain operations actually work. The real answer is in the wallet flows—they’re just talking nonsense. --- Decentralized social? Just listen and move on. The big transactions behind the scenes are the real story. --- Here comes another "there's no perfect answer"—which basically means no one actually wants to solve it. Don’t we all know what capital really wants? --- I dug through three nights of on-chain data on this governance design issue, and my conclusion is—it’s a false proposition from the start. --- Free speech vs child protection, uh... the backend data already determines the bias, it’s just about who pays more. --- Can distributed systems solve this? That’s naive. As long as whale addresses exist, there’s always a black box—same old story, just a different package. --- Once again, a bunch of bureaucrats muddling things up. I really want to see which suspicious institutional addresses on-chain are pushing this.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiLeftOnReadvip
· 3h ago
Nah fr, this is just an endless deadlock. Regulation and freedom are inherently opposed.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMortgagevip
· 3h ago
NGL, this is a lose-lose situation—no matter what, you'll end up offending someone.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMiseryvip
· 3h ago
ngl this is just a dead end. How can you protect kids without touching freedom of speech... impossible
View OriginalReply0
shadowy_supercodervip
· 3h ago
Nah, this is a dead end, you're damned if you do, damned if you don't... --- Decentralization sounds great, but it's not a silver bullet, bro. --- Forget it, politicians can't really control this stuff anyway. --- Free speech vs. child safety, an eternal conflict... --- There's really no solution. Either you lock everything down or you let it go—there's no middle ground. --- The Web3 community is just riding the hype again. --- The core issue is still who gets to define "harmful"—this will never be clearly resolved.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)