💥 Gate Square Event: #PostToWinCC 💥
Post original content on Gate Square related to Canton Network (CC) or its ongoing campaigns for a chance to share 3,334 CC rewards!
📅 Event Period:
Nov 10, 2025, 10:00 – Nov 17, 2025, 16:00 (UTC)
📌 Related Campaigns:
Launchpool: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/48098
CandyDrop: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/48092
Earn: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/48119
📌 How to Participate:
1️⃣ Post original content about Canton (CC) or its campaigns on Gate Square.
2️⃣ Content must be at least 80 words.
3️⃣ Add the hashtag #PostTo
So the legal battle over tariffs just took an interesting turn at the Supreme Court last week. The administration's lawyers made this argument that caught my attention – they're claiming these tariffs under IEEPA aren't really about collecting revenue, they're regulatory tools.
Here's the thing though: we've all heard the public messaging about how these tariffs would bring in massive funds, right? There's this obvious disconnect between what's being sold to the public and what's being argued in court. Classic legal maneuvering, but it matters for markets.
Why should crypto folks care? Well, macro policy uncertainty like this creates ripples. When traditional finance gets shaky over trade wars and legal ambiguities, digital assets often see interesting movement. Plus, if these emergency powers get validated, it sets precedent for how quickly policy can shift without congressional approval.
The IEEPA angle is particularly wild because it's supposed to be for actual emergencies, but it's becoming this go-to tool for economic policy. That kind of centralized power play is exactly what pushes more people toward decentralized alternatives. Just saying.