Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

So the legal battle over tariffs just took an interesting turn at the Supreme Court last week. The administration's lawyers made this argument that caught my attention – they're claiming these tariffs under IEEPA aren't really about collecting revenue, they're regulatory tools.



Here's the thing though: we've all heard the public messaging about how these tariffs would bring in massive funds, right? There's this obvious disconnect between what's being sold to the public and what's being argued in court. Classic legal maneuvering, but it matters for markets.

Why should crypto folks care? Well, macro policy uncertainty like this creates ripples. When traditional finance gets shaky over trade wars and legal ambiguities, digital assets often see interesting movement. Plus, if these emergency powers get validated, it sets precedent for how quickly policy can shift without congressional approval.

The IEEPA angle is particularly wild because it's supposed to be for actual emergencies, but it's becoming this go-to tool for economic policy. That kind of centralized power play is exactly what pushes more people toward decentralized alternatives. Just saying.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ShitcoinConnoisseurvip
· 11-15 02:33
Well, this is ridiculous. On one hand, they tell us that tariffs can make big money, and on the other hand, in court, they say it's a regulatory tool. The government's double standards are really impressive. This power vacuum is most favourable; the more chaotic TradFi is, the easier it is for encryption to break through. The abuse of IEEPA should have been criticized long ago; this set of central authority is basically a textbook for us.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLadyvip
· 11-15 01:15
ngl, watching them argue one thing in court and sell another to the public is pure comedy. but fr though, this is exactly the kinda centralized overreach that makes my gwei meter twitch. when the gas prices spike on uncertainty, you know institutions are scrambling. bullish for defi, honestly.
Reply0
MainnetDelayedAgainvip
· 11-15 01:15
The government speaks of "taxation", while the court refers to "regulation"... According to the database, the time difference between these two statements is sufficient for the market to reprice. Several days have passed since the last public commitment, and the latest postponement notice is the Nth time.
View OriginalReply0
failed_dev_successful_apevip
· 11-15 00:49
ngl this trap of saying one thing and doing another is really amazing, saying in court that it's not a tax, and then going out and bragging about making big money, this wave of policy uncertainty directly pushed the entire macro environment centralized power is playing to the extreme, no wonder more and more people are turning to crypto, this is the best endorsement.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)