Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Last week, I noticed Walrus announced a partnership with io.net. Initially, I didn't pay much attention. But upon closer consideration, the potential of this development might be underestimated.
On the io.net side, they operate a decentralized GPU computing market, currently holding over 10,000 GPUs and CPU resources. The process for AI training is as follows: after running the model, the generated datasets and weight files need to be stored. The problem is that computing and storage are originally two separate streams, requiring developers to interface with different service providers, making the process fragmented and inefficient.
Now, Walrus is directly integrated into io.net's paid system, effectively combining computing and storage into an all-in-one solution. Imagine a real scenario: you rent an A100 GPU on io.net to train a model, and once the 20GB weight file is trained, it can be directly stored in Walrus, with storage proof automatically recorded on the Sui chain. When needed, you can retrieve from Walrus, with full integrity and clear data provenance. The entire operation can be done without leaving the platform, providing a seamless user experience.
From a data perspective, Walrus currently has a total capacity of 4,167 TB, utilizing only 26%, which means ample storage reserves capable of handling large AI training files. On the io.net side, GPU utilization remains high, and the user groups on both sides overlap significantly—mostly AI application developers. This partnership isn't just a PR stunt for hype; it's driven by real application scenarios that complement each other.
Regarding token performance, the price hovers around 0.1406, with a recent decline of 11.2%, and a market cap steady at about $221 million. The decline isn't negligible, but compared to strategic collaborations like io.net, short-term fluctuations are less important. The staking amount for nodes remains at around $1.426 million, indicating that long-term players are still confident.
This kind of infrastructure integration is much more interesting than working alone. The AI computing market is right in front of us, and as long as storage can seize this opportunity, future business growth is just a matter of time.
However, it still depends on actual user growth in the future. Having capacity reserves alone is useless.
The stable pledge amount indicates that big players are genuinely optimistic about long-term development. I still prefer to observe for a period of time.
Infrastructure protocols like this are often overestimated, and it's easier for the market to crash when that happens. Let's wait and see for 3-6 months.
Now I understand why so many developers complain about fragmentation; someone really should put these two together.
But to be honest, a 26% storage utilization looks good, but the real key is whether it can handle large AI files without lagging.
The staking amount remains steady at 1.42 million. Long-term players aren’t fools; they probably sense something.
Hash power and storage should have been integrated from the start, and now finally someone is doing it.
I'm optimistic about the long term; short-term fluctuations are just noise.