Recently, I’ve been studying how Walrus and io.net work together, and it’s quite interesting. In simple terms, one handles computation, and the other handles privacy storage. This combination significantly reduces costs for AI startups.



Real-world examples include: DLP Labs using this solution to process electric vehicle log data, directly reducing costs by 22%; CudisWellness uses it to manage health data, ensuring privacy while also allowing profit sharing. This actually hits the pain point of the entire "data economy"—data needs to be active rather than locked in one place, and users can access it flexibly like with tools such as Seal.

From a broader perspective, this approach is somewhat like building an "AI full stack"—Sui as the foundation, with over 190 projects ranging from concept to product operation. On the anniversary of the mainnet launch, Seal’s daily request volume exceeds 80,000+, indicating that users truly need this. Even more interesting is the shift in logic: privacy protection is no longer about hiding things but about transparency under compliance—125 nodes with a utilization rate of 28%, these numbers are enough to show that the entire system has entered a verifiable operational stage.
WAL3.9%
IO2.74%
SUI4.71%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
ClassicDumpstervip
· 01-21 12:28
Wow, this combination really has some substance. A 22% cost reduction—if you’re not bragging, it really can be achieved.

I just want to ask, are most of the current users of this方案 AI startups? I haven't heard of any big companies following suit...

Privacy isn't about hiding but about transparency. That argument is quite fresh, but I'm just worried that the actual implementation might be another story.

Seal's daily request volume of 80,000 sounds pretty hot, but with a utilization rate of only 28%, what's going on? Is it not fully utilized yet or is there a problem?

With over 190 projects in the Sui ecosystem, this point indeed cannot be completely dismissed.
View OriginalReply0
DustCollectorvip
· 01-20 11:27
A 22% reduction in costs is such a huge amount of potential, but it still feels like too few projects are truly utilizing it.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmivip
· 01-19 17:02
This combination really hits the mark. Data only becomes valuable when it flows; otherwise, it's just a pile of useless data.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmivip
· 01-19 16:56
Bro, a 22% reduction in costs is indeed impressive, but with only 28% utilization of those 125 nodes... there's still room for growth.
View OriginalReply0
Lonely_Validatorvip
· 01-19 16:55
Haha, a 22% cost reduction is indeed impressive, but can these two projects really coordinate seamlessly?

---

Seal's daily requests exceed 80,000, right? That data really shows something.

---

Privacy protection = compliance and transparency? That's an interesting logical reversal.

---

AI startups jump at cost reductions as soon as they hear about it. Do they have to be so aggressive?

---

125 nodes with 28% utilization... Is this during cold start or is there truly insufficient demand?

---

The case with DLP Labs feels a bit like marketing hype. Can the real ROI be that high?

---

Data needs to flow to be valuable, that's a point I agree with.

---

Wait, CudisWellness health data can still be shared profitably? How does that work?

---

Sui ecosystem has over 190 projects, sounds explosive, but what about activity levels? Is there a lot of fluff?

---

The core of this combination is still cost reduction, but the privacy aspect seems a bit superficial.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin