Ethereum (ETH) Treasury Firm Loses $82.8M. Here's What Happened

@media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^=“wrapper-sevio-6a57f7be-8f6e-4deb-ae2c-5477f86653a5”]{width:320px;height:100px;} } @media only screen and (min-width: 728px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^=“wrapper-sevio-6a57f7be-8f6e-4deb-ae2c-5477f86653a5”]{width:728px;height:90px;} }

FG Nexus, a major Ethereum treasury firm, has further reduced its ETH holdings by offloading 7,550 ETH in a single transaction. This move continues the firm’s series of asset disposals that began late last year, despite prior plans to increase its Ethereum reserves

Even after the series of liquidations, FG Nexus still retains more than 37,000 ETH, showing a partial but significant exit from its previously aggressive accumulation strategy.

This latest liquidation comes after FG Nexus purchased tens of thousands of ETH to expand its treasury. Between August and September 2025, the company accumulated 50,770 ETH, totaling $196 million, at an average cost of $3,860 per token.

FG Nexus Initial Accumulation Plan

Initially, FG Nexus planned to strengthen its Ethereum position, even considering selling property assets to fund more Ethereum purchases. After the 2025 crypto crash, FG Nexus shifted gears and started selling off assets, including 21,025 ETH for $55.7m.

The 7,550 ETH sale is only a continuation of this exit strategy, as the firm adapts to ongoing market volatility and unrealized losses exceeding $70 million.

Institutional and Individual Liquidation

These individual and institutional sales are contributing to increased selling pressure on Ethereum, even though its long-term adoption prospects remain a central narrative in the crypto community.

This contrast highlights the difference in strategies between firms reacting to short-term market conditions and those pursuing long-term accumulation objectives.

The recent transactions by FG Nexus, Vitalik Buterin, and other market participants show the complex dynamics affecting Ethereum’s institutional landscape. While some firms are actively liquidating assets in response to price volatility and strategic adjustments, others remain committed to increasing their holdings.

Disclaimer*: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.*