👀 家人們,每天看行情、刷大佬觀點,卻從來不開口說兩句?你的觀點可能比你想的更有價值!
廣場新人 & 回歸福利正式上線!不管你是第一次發帖還是久違回歸,我們都直接送你獎勵!🎁
每月 $20,000 獎金等你來領!
📅 活動時間: 長期有效(月底結算)
💎 參與方式:
用戶需爲首次發帖的新用戶或一個月未發帖的回歸用戶。
發帖時必須帶上話題標籤: #我在广场发首帖 。
內容不限:幣圈新聞、行情分析、曬單吐槽、幣種推薦皆可。
💰 獎勵機制:
必得獎:發帖體驗券
每位有效發帖用戶都可獲得 $50 倉位體驗券。(注:每月獎池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太熱情,我們會繼續加碼!)
進階獎:發帖雙王爭霸
月度發帖王: 當月發帖數量最多的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
月度互動王: 當月帖子互動量(點讚+評論+轉發+分享)最高的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
📝 發帖要求:
帖子字數需 大於30字,拒絕純表情或無意義字符。
內容需積極健康,符合社區規範,嚴禁廣告引流及違規內容。
💡 你的觀點可能會啓發無數人,你的第一次分享也許就是成爲“廣場大V”的起點,現在就開始廣場創作之旅吧!
BREAKING: Binance Joins Ripple (XRP) to Fight for Customers, Investors, and the Entire Industry with Protective Order Against SEC and Gary Gensler
In a significant move, Binance, a dominant figure in the crypto world, has filed for a protective court order against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This action comes in light of what Binance describes as extensive and unwarranted requests for information from the regulatory authority.
Delving into the specifics, in a submission to the US District Court of Columbia, BAM Trading and BAM Management, which operate under the umbrella of Binance U.S., asserted that they have already met the regulator’s data needs. The essence of their argument revolves around the SEC’s demands being not just expansive, but also placing an undue strain on their operations.
One of the primary objectives of the protective order is to curtail the scope of the SEC’s reach. Binance suggests limiting the regulatory body to merely four depositions from BAM employees. Additionally, the crypto giant has expressed its intent to exempt the depositions of key figures, specifically BAM’s Chief utive and its Chief Financial Officer, without explicitly mentioning any names.
This tussle between Binance and the SEC traces back to June when the regulatory body leveled substantial allegations against both Binance and its Chief utive, Changpeng Zhao. These accusations were far from minor, highlighting a purported “web of deception.” The SEC’s 13-charge list was comprehensive, ranging from claims of Binance artificially boosting its trading volumes to accusations of misleading investors regarding its market surveillance mechanisms.
Moreover, the SEC, it seems, hasn’t shown much flexibility. The regulatory body has turned down BAM’s attempts to reasonably confine its information requisitions and remains steadfast against the motion for a protective order, as per the recent filing.
As this legal saga continues, both parties – Binance and the SEC – have yet to offer a public comment on the unfolding situation. The crypto community awaits further developments with bated breath, as this case might set significant precedents for future regulatory interactions.
Best Crypto Exchange for Everyone: