👀 家人們,每天看行情、刷大佬觀點,卻從來不開口說兩句?你的觀點可能比你想的更有價值!
廣場新人 & 回歸福利正式上線!不管你是第一次發帖還是久違回歸,我們都直接送你獎勵!🎁
每月 $20,000 獎金等你來領!
📅 活動時間: 長期有效(月底結算)
💎 參與方式:
用戶需爲首次發帖的新用戶或一個月未發帖的回歸用戶。
發帖時必須帶上話題標籤: #我在广场发首帖 。
內容不限:幣圈新聞、行情分析、曬單吐槽、幣種推薦皆可。
💰 獎勵機制:
必得獎:發帖體驗券
每位有效發帖用戶都可獲得 $50 倉位體驗券。(注:每月獎池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太熱情,我們會繼續加碼!)
進階獎:發帖雙王爭霸
月度發帖王: 當月發帖數量最多的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
月度互動王: 當月帖子互動量(點讚+評論+轉發+分享)最高的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
📝 發帖要求:
帖子字數需 大於30字,拒絕純表情或無意義字符。
內容需積極健康,符合社區規範,嚴禁廣告引流及違規內容。
💡 你的觀點可能會啓發無數人,你的第一次分享也許就是成爲“廣場大V”的起點,現在就開始廣場創作之旅吧!
Is Cardano, Litecoin, or Stellar (XLM) Security in the US? XRP Stands Alone with 100% Clarity
In a significant development following a prolonged legal dispute, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Ripple have finally received a verdict regarding the classification of XRP. The SEC had filed an action against Ripple Labs, Inc. (“Ripple”) and its senior leaders, Bradley Garlinghouse and Christian A. Larsen, alleging their involvement in the unlawful offer and sale of securities, a violation of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933.
According to the document in Case 1:20-cv-10832-AT-SN Document 874 filed on July 13, 2023, the SEC specifically accused Ripple of engaging in these violations. Furthermore, the SEC alleged that Garlinghouse and Larsen aided and abetted Ripple’s Section 5 violations. These legal proceedings set the stage for the recent ruling and regulatory clarity on the classification of XRP.
The judge presiding over the case, Judge Torres, issued a final ruling based on motions for summary judgment filed by both parties. The ruling provides clarity on two main aspects. Firstly, Judge Torres categorizes XRP as a digital token rather than a security, aligning with the argument put forth by John Deaton. This verdict sets XRP apart from other cryptocurrencies like Cardano, Litecoin, and Stellar (XLM) that are still awaiting regulatory clarity. XRP becomes the only crypto asset to have undergone a trial and received full regulatory clarity.
Secondly, the judge rules on the ious types of XRP sales or distributions conducted by Ripple. The ruling is divided into four parts, addressing different aspects of these sales, as detailed in the aforementioned
To summarize, the judge’s ruling establishes that while some of Ripple’s XRP sales were deemed illegal securities offerings, the majority of them were considered legal commodity trades.
It is important to note that the ruling does not address whether secondary sales of XRP qualify as securities or not. Judge Torres emphasizes that this determination would depend on the specific circumstances and economic reality of each contract or transaction, citing other lawsuits involving Telegram and LBRY.
Following the ruling, XRP has experienced a significant rally of 30%, reclaiming the $0.60 price point for the first time this year due to increased demand. The cryptocurrency has broken through multiple resistance levels and is currently trading at $0.6046.
While this ruling brings clarity to the status of XRP, the case is not yet concluded, as there may be appeals or further proceedings to determine potential damages or penalties for the illegal sales.
In conclusion, the verdict regarding the classification of XRP as a digital token and not a security sets it apart from other cryptocurrencies, highlighting the need for regulatory clarity in the industry. The allegations brought forward by the SEC against Ripple Labs, Inc. and its senior leaders further underscore the legal complexities surrounding the case.