👀 家人們,每天看行情、刷大佬觀點,卻從來不開口說兩句?你的觀點可能比你想的更有價值!
廣場新人 & 回歸福利正式上線!不管你是第一次發帖還是久違回歸,我們都直接送你獎勵!🎁
每月 $20,000 獎金等你來領!
📅 活動時間: 長期有效(月底結算)
💎 參與方式:
用戶需爲首次發帖的新用戶或一個月未發帖的回歸用戶。
發帖時必須帶上話題標籤: #我在广场发首帖 。
內容不限:幣圈新聞、行情分析、曬單吐槽、幣種推薦皆可。
💰 獎勵機制:
必得獎:發帖體驗券
每位有效發帖用戶都可獲得 $50 倉位體驗券。(注:每月獎池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太熱情,我們會繼續加碼!)
進階獎:發帖雙王爭霸
月度發帖王: 當月發帖數量最多的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
月度互動王: 當月帖子互動量(點讚+評論+轉發+分享)最高的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
📝 發帖要求:
帖子字數需 大於30字,拒絕純表情或無意義字符。
內容需積極健康,符合社區規範,嚴禁廣告引流及違規內容。
💡 你的觀點可能會啓發無數人,你的第一次分享也許就是成爲“廣場大V”的起點,現在就開始廣場創作之旅吧!
SEC Names No Cryptocurrencies Other than CEL Securities in Fresh Filing
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a lawsuit against fallen crypto lender Celsius and its ex-boss, Alex Mashinsky after the latter was reportedly arrested on Thursday.
The agency accused Celsius of illegally raising billions of dollars through unregistered securities offerings, but only named CEL token as a relevant crypto security in the case.
SEC V. Celsius and Mashinsky
The lawsuit, filed Thursday morning in a Manhattan federal court, claimed that both Celsius and Mashinsky “misled investors” by fraudulently manipulating the price of CEL – described as “Celsius’s own crypto asset security.”
CEL served a iety of internal functions for Celsius users, such as boosting owners’ earnings payouts on the Celsius platform. It was how Celsius raised money during its initial coin offering (ICO) in 2018.
The SEC took further issue with the company’s “Earn Interest Program” – one of its main offerings that provided users with interest for depositing their crypto. Payouts ied from asset to asset, with some cryptos promising interest above 17%.
For his violations, the SEC seeks civil and disgorgement penalties against Mashinksy, as well as restrictions barring him from purchasing, offering, or selling crypto asset securities in the future.
Celsius has also been sued by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), the Commodities and Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) on ious charges of fraud and market manipulation.
SEC, Crypto, and Securities
The SEC has demonstrated outright hostility to crypto lending firms in the past due to their relationship with securities laws, and the questionably high rates offered on some coins relative to traditional savings accounts.
For instance, the agency helped force rival lender Nexo to exit the United States last year through legal constraints against providing a crypto lending business. Several such firms including Celsius, Voyager, BlockFi, and Genesis crumbled last year, and ultimately declared bankruptcy.
Meanwhile, staking services – which pay depositors with interest using yield provided by blockchain staking – have also been targeted by the SEC. The commission fined crypto exchange Kraken $30 million for its staking product in February and forced it to close the offering permanently.
In lawsuits against Coinbase and Binance last month, the SEC named multiple high-value tokens as “crypto asset securities,” including Cardano (ADA), Solana (SOL), Polygon (MATIC), and BNB.