Luke Gromen Says 'Nuclear Printing' Needed to Push Bitcoin Back Into Bull Market

BTC0,69%

Bitcoiners often argue that BTC should thrive when the global financial system starts to look unstable. But Luke Gromen says that this time, BTC simply was not behaving the way he thought it should, and that was enough for him to slash a position he described as “irresponsibly large.”

Gromen Says BTC’s Weakness Against Gold, Bond-Market Stress, and a Lack of “Nuclear Printing” Drove His Exit

In a new interview with Danny Knowles, Gromen said he sold most of his bitcoin around the $95,000 to $96,000 range after a series of warning signs started to stack up.

He said that at first, he was concerned that BTC simply was “not acting the way it should.” He pointed to M2 money supply trends and said BTC was not responding the way he expected, then highlighted another unusual development, which is that bitcoin had gone essentially unchanged against gold over a five-year stretch, something he said had never happened before.

Gromen also noted bitcoin has a habit of breaking old patterns as it matures, just as it did in 2022 when it fell below a prior cycle high. But he said broader market conditions began to reinforce his unease. What he was seeing in Japan’s bond market — yields rising while the yen fell — looked to him like emerging-market behavior, not the kind of backdrop that ends well for risk assets.

In his view, anything less than extremely loose policy, even negative interest rates, still amounts to tight financial conditions because of mounting risks from AI-driven job losses, cracks in private credit, and persistent stress in Japanese bond markets. Until policymakers respond with overwhelming force, Gromen says he still sees a risk-off world, not one where bitcoin suddenly races to $120,000.

Says Gromen:

I need to see more aggressive, nuclear printing if you will. We literally have completely put on the back burner this whole AI thing for the last two weeks and I think if this Iran war is over, which they’ve managed to paper over concerns with…

[Last week] here in the US we had 92,000 jobs lost. And you’re seeing job openings in sort of every sector where you’d expect AI to curtail job openings. You’re seeing job openings in freefall in finance, you’re seeing them fall in tech, you’re seeing them drop in services. And just keep hearing more and more and seeing more and more signs in that world that this is accelerating at an exponential rate, and if that’s the case, then our debt-based system consumer credit is going to be a giant smoking crater, because of AI.

FAQ

  • Why did Luke Gromen sell most of his bitcoin?

He said bitcoin was not acting the way he expected, while multiple warning signs — including weakness versus gold, bond-market stress, and technical breakdowns — pushed him to cut exposure.

  • What did Gromen mean when he said bitcoin was “not acting the way it should”?

He said BTC was not reacting to M2 money supply the way he expected and had gone roughly flat against gold over five years, which he viewed as unusual.

  • What is Gromen’s “nuclear printing” comment about?

He said he would need to see much more aggressive money creation and easier financial conditions before becoming more constructive on bitcoin again.

  • Does Gromen still like bitcoin long term?

Yes. His comments suggest the issue is timing and macro conditions, not a total rejection of bitcoin’s longer-term thesis.

Isenção de responsabilidade: As informações contidas nesta página podem ser provenientes de terceiros e não representam os pontos de vista ou opiniões da Gate. O conteúdo apresentado nesta página é apenas para referência e não constitui qualquer aconselhamento financeiro, de investimento ou jurídico. A Gate não garante a exatidão ou o carácter exaustivo das informações e não poderá ser responsabilizada por quaisquer perdas resultantes da utilização destas informações. Os investimentos em ativos virtuais implicam riscos elevados e estão sujeitos a uma volatilidade de preços significativa. Pode perder todo o seu capital investido. Compreenda plenamente os riscos relevantes e tome decisões prudentes com base na sua própria situação financeira e tolerância ao risco. Para mais informações, consulte a Isenção de responsabilidade.

Related Articles

O Bitcoin Imprime um Gráfico de Alta Semelhante ao do Pulso Anterior, A Liquidez Estará Pronta para Regressar ao Mercado Cripto?

O Bitcoin apresenta um gráfico bullish semelhante ao do impulso anterior. Isto leva os especialistas a esperar que a liquidez regresse ao mercado das criptomoedas em breve. O ciclo de alta das criptomoedas vai entrar numa fase de extensão bullish? O mercado de criptomoedas continua de forma estável num padrão lateral, com o preço do BTC neste momento

CryptoNewsLand1h atrás

Atualização de desempenho CoinDesk 20: O Bitcoin (BTC) negocia sem variação enquanto as altcoins sobem

O índice CoinDesk 20 mostra uma subida de 0,7% para 1909,43, com 19 ativos em alta. NEAR e AVAX lideram com ganhos de 5,8% e 3,6%, enquanto BTC e XLM permanecem inalterados.

CoinDesk2h atrás

O Bitcoin atinge a marca dos 72.000 USD e vai liquidar 2,5 mil milhões USD em posições vendidas (short)

O Bitcoin atinge o marco dos 72.000 USD e irá liquidar 2,5 mil milhões de USD em posições de venda (short), podendo “esmagar” o lado baixista que está a usar alavancagem excessiva. A guerra no Irão e os preços elevados do petróleo estão atualmente a exercer pressão sobre o BTC, mas uma cessação do fogo ou entradas de fluxos provenientes de um ETF podem despoletar uma recuperação rápida. 2,5 mil milhões USD em posições short

TapChiBitcoin2h atrás

F2Pool cofundador Wang Chun: A atualização do protocolo do Bitcoin não deve ser feita através de uma “lei de agrupamento”, opõe-se ao BIP-110 e ao BIP-54

F2Pool 联创王纯 afirmou na plataforma X que a actualização do protocolo Bitcoin não deve ser como o “projecto de lei de restrição” de certos políticos dos EUA, opondo-se ao BIP-110 e ao BIP-54. Mencionou que o ataque de desvio de tempo não traz benefícios significativos para os mineradores, e que a eficiência de validação de blocos já melhorou de forma significativa; actualmente, apenas o problema do “reenvio de transacções” merece ser corrigido.

GateNews3h atrás
Comentar
0/400
Nenhum comentário