Mainstream financial media keeps rolling out the red carpet for Bitcoin evangelists. Softball questions, zero accountability. Nobody's asking these guests why their price predictions crashed harder than the asset itself. Even more telling? Gold and silver are ripping higher while Bitcoin—the so-called "digital gold"—keeps bleeding out. Where's the tough questioning on that inconvenient truth?

Elon recently dropped some interesting takes on how he's been running the platform lately. His approach? Pushing for what he calls a balanced, centrist stance on content moderation.
According to him, the goal has been restoring equilibrium to the platform. He emphasized that left-leaning voices haven't faced suspensions or bans under his watch—a deliberate move to counter perceptions of bias.
Whether you buy into his framing or not, it's clear he's trying to position the platform as politically neutral ground. The whole "common sense" angle he's pitching basically boils down to: let different

Trump just dropped a bombshell: "Never sell your Bitcoin!" The 47th President's latest stance on BTC couldn't be clearer. This isn't just casual talk—it's a direct endorsement from the White House. Whether you're a hodler or trader, this statement is making waves across crypto markets right now. The President's bullish signal comes at a time when institutional adoption keeps climbing. What does this mean for Bitcoin's trajectory? One thing's certain: the message from the top is loud and unmistakable.

Musk just dropped an unexpectedly humble take about X's real position in the digital landscape.
During a recent podcast conversation, he pushed back against the hype. "Look, on the internet, I'm small," he admitted. The numbers tell part of the story - X doesn't dominate the raw traffic stats when you stack it against the giants.
But here's where it gets interesting. He argues that sheer user count isn't the whole game. What matters? X shapes the narrative. It's where breaking news hits first, where policy debates ignite, where cultural shifts get their spark.
Think about it - how many headlin

Two tech titans just dropped their latest takes on Bitcoin's trajectory, and honestly? The implications are wild. Elon Musk and Michael Saylor recently shared perspectives that might reshape how we think about BTC, ETH, and BNB in the coming months. Most folks are completely missing what these signals actually mean for crypto markets. The conversation touches on adoption patterns that could accelerate faster than anyone's currently pricing in.

That tech billionaire dropped an interesting take on Bitcoin recently. He argues it's a real currency precisely because energy backs it—and here's the kicker: nobody can just legislate energy out of existence. Makes you wonder if traditional fiat defenders have a counterargument to that logic.

SpaceX CEO reaffirmed the company's humanitarian stance on connectivity during crises. When natural disasters strike, Starlink terminals get activated at no cost to affected communities. The billionaire tech entrepreneur emphasized a firm principle: never turning tragedy into a profit center. This approach has won praise across relief organizations, though some question long-term sustainability. Either way, it's another move cementing his reputation as someone who plays by different rules—whether in space tech, electric vehicles, or that other thing he occasionally tweets about at 3 AM.

Tech billionaire doubles down on his crypto stance. In a recent statement, Musk articulated why he views Bitcoin as genuine currency rather than speculative asset. His reasoning? The network's proof-of-work mechanism ties its value directly to computational energy expenditure. "Bitcoin qualifies as real money because it's fundamentally energy-based," he explained. This perspective frames BTC less as digital gold and more as stored energy in monetary form—a narrative that's gaining traction among institutional voices.

Something's off about how Thanksgiving week got covered. Major indices crushed it—Dow up over 3%, S&P 500 climbing nearly 4%, Nasdaq jumping 4%+. Solid numbers, right? But here's what didn't make the headlines: gold rallied 3.6%, and silver absolutely ripped 13%. That's not a typo. A 13% move in silver during the same week, yet crickets from most coverage. Makes you wonder what else flies under the radar when precious metals outperform but don't fit the narrative.

Musk just dropped another hot take on Bitcoin - calling it a "true currency" rooted in energy. His argument? Energy can't be regulated by legislation, which makes BTC fundamentally different from fiat.
This ties back to his long-standing view that Bitcoin's proof-of-work mechanism anchors it to real-world physics. Unlike traditional money that governments can print at will, mining requires actual energy expenditure.
Whether you agree or not, it's an interesting angle on what gives crypto its value proposition. The energy debate isn't going away anytime soon.

Gold bug Peter Schiff just dropped another hot take—calling Bitcoin a "fake asset." The long-time crypto skeptic isn't holding back on his criticism of BTC again. Same old tune from the precious metals advocate who's never been shy about his stance on digital currencies.

A 28-point framework for resolving the Ukraine situation has surfaced, reportedly from Trump's camp. The proposal includes some eyebrow-raising stipulations: additional territorial concessions from Kyiv, a military force cap at 50% of current levels, and a permanent waiver on NATO membership.
Moscow's response? They're calling it "a foundation for discussion."
Whatever your take on the geopolitics, these developments matter for markets. Policy shifts of this magnitude ripple through energy prices, commodities, and risk assets. Crypto traders watching macro should keep tabs on how negotiations

Someone asked the tech mogul why he's so obsessed with the letter X. His response? Classic self-awareness mixed with humor: "Honestly, it's a good question. Sometimes I wonder what's wrong with me."
The man rebranded an entire social platform around it, named his company X Corp, and still questions his own fixation. That level of public introspection is rare among billionaire founders. Whether it's branding genius or personal quirk, the X obsession has become part of his identity—and the internet can't stop talking about it.

💸 Richest Immigrant Names in America - Major Players in the Crypto and Technology World
A list that closely concerns the digital asset markets:
🥇 Elon Musk – 393.1 billion $ ( South African-born, head of Tesla and X, supporter of DOGE )
🥈 Sergey Brin – 139.7 billion $ ( Russia, co-founder of Google )
🥉 Jensen Huang – 137.9 billion $ ( Taiwan, NVIDIA CEO, the chip supplier for crypto mining )
4️⃣ Thomas Peterffy – $40.5 billion (Hungary, founder of the fintech giant Interactive Brokers)
5️⃣ Miriam Adelson & Family – $35.2 billion (Israel, casino and entertainment sector)
6️⃣ Peter Thiel – $

CNBC's Jim Cramer just dropped a bombshell during a live segment—calling Bitcoin a legitimate hedge against dollar hyperinflation. Not exactly subtle anymore, is it? When mainstream finance voices start openly framing BTC as protection from currency collapse, you know the narrative's shifting. Whether you're bullish or skeptical, watching traditional media figures validate crypto's role in portfolio defense is wild. The "quiet part" isn't so quiet these days.

MicroStrategy's Executive Chairman dropped a bombshell during his recent appearance on Saudi state television. The billionaire tech entrepreneur didn't mince words, urging the Kingdom to go all-in on Bitcoin for its strategic reserves.
This isn't just casual advice from a random talking head. We're talking about someone who's put his money where his mouth is—his company holds over 400,000 BTC on its balance sheet. That kind of conviction tends to turn heads, especially when you're pitching to one of the world's wealthiest nations.
What makes this moment particularly intriguing? Saudi Arabia ha

Breaking: International Monetary Fund shifts stance on tokenization tech. Traditional finance heavyweights warming up to blockchain-based asset digitization. Game changer or just PR?

Turns out the legend behind the Big Short wasn't just watching from the sidelines during that wild GME squeeze. Fresh revelations show Michael Burry was actually in the trenches with major players, mapping out just how criminally underpriced GameStop really was back then.
Fast forward five years—he's breaking his silence again. More chapters of the GME saga are surfacing, and here's the kicker: Burry's dropping hints that this story is far from over. What's brewing beneath the surface? The man who predicted the 2008 crash clearly sees something the rest of us are missing. GameStop might've had

Every single time I think maybe I've been too critical of journalists, reality slaps me in the face with another example proving I haven't been critical enough. Not even close.

Did anyone catch that unexpected cameo in the newest South Park drop? Arc Raiders—yeah, that explosive title everyone's been buzzing about—just made its way onto the show. Wild crossover moment, honestly. The game's cultural reach is getting pretty insane.