2026-02-10 18:47:00

Honest question:

Would it make more sense to incentivize with farms $MET liquidity primarily through a stable pair (MET/USDC) rather than MET/SOL?
My concern lately has been SOL downside risk spilling over into Meteora LPs. Even if MET fundamentals stay unchanged, SOL volatility directly impacts LP performance and impermanent loss.
From a market-structure perspective, anchoring the main liquidity pool to USDC could:
• Reduce exposure to SOL-driven volatility
• Make MET pricing more predictable
• Improve capital efficiency for LPs who want MET exposure without directional SOL risk
Notably, the highest TVL already sits in the MET/USDC pool, which suggests market preference is leaning that way.
Just thinking out loud

MET-2,1%

USDC-0,01%

SOL-5,01%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.