Imagine holding physical silver since 1980—dropped $69 back then, watched it sit for five decades, and finally cashed out at $90 in 2030. That's roughly 30% total return over 50 years. Meanwhile, early Bitcoin believers who grabbed BTC in the early days saw astronomical gains over similar timeframes. It's a stark reminder of why portfolio diversification matters, especially when comparing traditional commodities against emerging digital assets. The long game plays different depending on what you're holding.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RektButAlive
· 17h ago
It takes 50 years to earn 30% on silver, while Bitcoin can easily multiply tenfold in a single bull market... That's why I went all in on digital assets haha
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMigrant
· 17h ago
Silver has only increased by 30% in 50 years. This really can't hold up anymore, it's even worse than fixed-term deposits.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictim
· 17h ago
It takes 50 years to earn only 30%. I'm an old man now. This is better than just lying in the bank and sleeping.
Imagine holding physical silver since 1980—dropped $69 back then, watched it sit for five decades, and finally cashed out at $90 in 2030. That's roughly 30% total return over 50 years. Meanwhile, early Bitcoin believers who grabbed BTC in the early days saw astronomical gains over similar timeframes. It's a stark reminder of why portfolio diversification matters, especially when comparing traditional commodities against emerging digital assets. The long game plays different depending on what you're holding.