Imagine holding physical silver since 1980—dropped $69 back then, watched it sit for five decades, and finally cashed out at $90 in 2030. That's roughly 30% total return over 50 years. Meanwhile, early Bitcoin believers who grabbed BTC in the early days saw astronomical gains over similar timeframes. It's a stark reminder of why portfolio diversification matters, especially when comparing traditional commodities against emerging digital assets. The long game plays different depending on what you're holding.

BTC-1,26%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RektButAlivevip
· 17h ago
It takes 50 years to earn 30% on silver, while Bitcoin can easily multiply tenfold in a single bull market... That's why I went all in on digital assets haha
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMigrantvip
· 17h ago
Silver has only increased by 30% in 50 years. This really can't hold up anymore, it's even worse than fixed-term deposits.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictimvip
· 17h ago
It takes 50 years to earn only 30%. I'm an old man now. This is better than just lying in the bank and sleeping.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)