The "free" gifts from limited edition collaboration gift sets have skyrocketed to a resale price of $250? The Kanto badge set from the Pokémon collaboration series is only available to customers who purchase the $650 premium gift box, yet many have been resold on the secondary market. This kind of scarcity created by limited edition strategies directly drives up resale prices. The jump from $0 to a $250 premium reflects the pricing logic of collectible markets for scarce assets—this phenomenon is common in the Web3 ecosystem. Can a brand's limited edition strategy truly control the flow, or is it inevitably re-priced by the market?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTPessimist
· 01-16 10:23
This is just a leek harvesting machine; by packaging some scarcity, you can make a quick profit.
View OriginalReply0
LiquiditySurfer
· 01-16 00:26
Haha, this is the magic of the market. Brands want to limit the quantity but end up being hyped to the sky.
Human nature is like this: the more taboo, the more people want it. When scarcity appears, the price immediately soars.
This trick has been overused in the NFT circle for a long time. Limited airdrops ➡️ and secondary market surges ➡️, harvesting retail investors repeatedly.
A badge costing $250... does anyone really spend that much? I don’t believe it, unless a big investor is playing financial games.
Actually, brands have known this would happen for a long time. It’s just another marketing tactic.
Limiting traffic was never effective; instead of blocking, it’s better to loosen up. Just let the market set the prices.
Once again, it’s a carnival for collectors and a show for retail investors to buy in.
Honestly, this model will end sooner or later. After the hype passes, these badges will be worth nothing.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a5fa8bd0
· 01-14 06:53
This is the trick to fleece the newbies, repeatedly deceiving them.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoWageSlave
· 01-14 06:53
Haha, this is the crypto circle's way—limited edition = cutting leeks
---
Wait, getting something for free and flipping it for $250? I know this logic well, just like NFT airdrops
---
Brands want to control the flow? Dream on, the final pricing power still lies in our hands
---
Got it, it's just the old combo of hunger marketing + secondary arbitrage, Web3 plays it the same way
---
Those who bought the $650 gift box were just cut, they’re the real money-makers
---
So, the essence of scarcity is artificially created anxiety, and the market is actually the most honest
---
I've seen this tactic too many times, brands simply can't control it
---
A $650 gift box for a $250 badge? Does anyone really think like that?
---
But on the other hand, turning $0 into $250, these second-hand traders are more stable than crypto traders
View OriginalReply0
PaperHandSister
· 01-14 06:52
This is just hype; limited edition items are meant to be resold.
View OriginalReply0
MercilessHalal
· 01-14 06:51
This is reality. Brands trying to control the flow is basically useless.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainGossiper
· 01-14 06:44
This is a classic case of "hunger marketing" backfiring, where limited availability actually fuels the desire for hype.
View OriginalReply0
TommyTeacher1
· 01-14 06:26
Laughing out loud, this is a classic case of hunger marketing backfiring, originally aiming to create scarcity but instead giving benefits to scalpers.
The "free" gifts from limited edition collaboration gift sets have skyrocketed to a resale price of $250? The Kanto badge set from the Pokémon collaboration series is only available to customers who purchase the $650 premium gift box, yet many have been resold on the secondary market. This kind of scarcity created by limited edition strategies directly drives up resale prices. The jump from $0 to a $250 premium reflects the pricing logic of collectible markets for scarce assets—this phenomenon is common in the Web3 ecosystem. Can a brand's limited edition strategy truly control the flow, or is it inevitably re-priced by the market?