Vitalik's endorsement still faces rejection, Hegota upgrades and abandons quantum-resistant frame transactions

Hegota升級棄用量子抗性幀交易

Ethereum client developers voted during an online meeting on March 27th, deciding not to prioritize “Frame Transactions” as an upcoming Hegota upgrade feature. Although Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin publicly endorsed the proposal during the meeting, multiple client developers rejected it due to its complexity, marking it as “consider for inclusion” instead.

Why Frame Transactions Were Downgraded: The Core of the Complexity Debate

以太坊會議 (Source: Forkcast)

The decision was made during the final confirmation stage of the Hegota upgrade feature prioritization. Last month, developers locked in FOCIL (Forced Fork Choice List) as the top priority for Hegota, aiming to enhance Ethereum network censorship resistance. Frame transactions were initially expected to be the second most important feature but ultimately did not gain majority support from developers.

Frame transactions aim to cover two main aspects: first, using post-quantum cryptography to prepare Ethereum against future quantum computing threats; second, providing a more powerful version of account abstraction, enabling blockchain applications to support traditional username-password logins and fee-less transactions, significantly lowering the entry barrier for average users.

Four Core Features of Frame Transactions

Quantum Resistance: Uses post-quantum cryptography to protect Ethereum accounts from future quantum attacks

Native Account Abstraction: Supports username-password login and fee-less transactions, approaching traditional web application experience

Privacy Scenario Expansion: Biconomy co-founder Ahmed Al-Balaghi pointed out that frame transactions have broad potential in privacy applications

Innovation Catalyst: Supporters believe this feature will bring a large number of new application scenarios to the Ethereum ecosystem

Developer Disagreements: Complexity Costs and the Future of Account Abstraction

Opponents mainly focus on implementation complexity. Daniel Lehrner from Besu said, “We think it’s too complex and the actual benefits are limited.” Ben Adams from Nethermind warned that forcing frame transactions into Hegota could slow down the entire upgrade timeline, conflicting with Ethereum’s current goal of accelerating upgrades.

Supporters are concerned about further delays in account abstraction. Developer Pashalathi Ramanujam stated during the meeting, “If frame transactions are not prioritized, there’s concern that we may never achieve native account abstraction in the near future.” Ahmed Al-Balaghi also expressed that this decision is a setback for Ethereum’s user experience development.

Offchain Labs (Arbitrum developers) senior product manager Daniel Lumi proposed a compromise, suggesting that instead of focusing solely on the frame transaction proposal, the broader improvement of account abstraction should be advanced within the Hegota discussion framework. He said, “We hear related feedback from users and businesses every day, and this is the most important choice for user experience.”

Ethereum Foundation leader and meeting host Ansgar Dietrichs concluded by saying that the account abstraction topic has gained broad recognition, and subsequent meetings are expected to continue pushing forward solutions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Hegota, and when is it expected to launch?

Hegota is the next major network upgrade planned after Pectra, expected to be launched in the second half of 2026. The confirmed top feature is FOCIL (Forced Fork Choice List), aimed at improving network censorship resistance.

What does “consider for inclusion” mean for Frame Transactions?

“Consider for inclusion” is a non-priority label in Ethereum’s upgrade process, indicating that the proposal will undergo comprehensive technical review in subsequent developer meetings but will not be a primary focus of Hegota. Final inclusion depends on future discussions.

What does account abstraction mean for ordinary Ethereum users?

Account abstraction aims to support traditional login methods like usernames and passwords in Ethereum applications and allows third parties to pay gas fees, greatly lowering the barrier for new users to use crypto wallets. It is widely regarded as a key pathway to improving user experience on Ethereum.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Justin Sun Deposits 53,660 ETH Worth $125M Into Spark After Aave Withdrawal

Justin Sun deposited 53,660 ETH worth $125 million into Spark, after withdrawing the tokens from Aave. He now holds about $2.13 billion in assets across Sky and Spark, along with $380 million in Aave.

GateNews8m ago

ETH drops 0.76% in 15 minutes: Dual pressure from whales’ proactive deleveraging and ETF fund outflows

Between 07:15 and 07:30 (UTC) on 2026-04-19, the ETH spot price fluctuated in the 2298.13 to 2322.69 USDT range, with an amplitude of 1.06% and a return of -0.76%. During this period, market attention increased; the sharp drop in price triggered widespread user focus, along with a clear surge in trading volume within a short time, indicating a sudden escalation in liquidity pressure. The main driver behind this deviation is that on-chain whale accounts actively sold ETH to repay DeFi platform borrowings in order to avoid forced liquidation. Based on on-chain tracking and fund-flow monitoring, from April 18 to 19, more than 42,000 ETH per-transaction large transfers were rapidly sent into a certain mainstream exchange, and at the same time there was a sharp spike in net inflows to the exchange. This concentrated sell pressure directly weakened spot market prices. Under proactive deleveraging behavior, selling pressure was released in the short term, creating a sudden market shock. In addition, during the period of price deviation, the ETH derivatives market saw a significant rise in passive liquidation volume, especially as leveraged long positions encountered strong liquidations during the price decline, further increasing supply pressure in the spot market. Meanwhile, ETH spot ETF funds continued to see net outflows; in mid-April, there were multiple days with single-day outflows exceeding $40-50M, with the largest single day reaching $200M. This reflects a warming of short-term institutional risk-avoidance sentiment, which led to a deeper shift downward in buy-side liquidity depth. The launch of a new public chain ecosystem also attracted some ETH liquidity migration, further weakening the capital protection layer of the mainnet. Multiple structural feedback effects amplified the downside move. At present, leverage risk in the ETH market remains prominent. Some whales still have large borrowings outstanding; if the price continues to move downward, potential liquidation risks may flare up again. ETF fund flows, on-chain large transfers, and capital-attraction moves tied to the new-chain ecosystem all need close monitoring. With increased short-term volatility risk, it is recommended to watch key support zones, exchange net inflow indicators, and DeFi on-chain liquidation dynamics in order to promptly grasp the latest market signals.

GateNews1h ago

ETH breaks below 2300 USDT

Gate News bot message, Gate market data shows that ETH has broken below 2300 USDT, with the current price at 2298.67 USDT.

CryptoRadar1h ago

ETH drops 0.58% in 15 minutes: derivatives liquidity contraction and proactive position reduction dominate short-term pullback

From 2026-04-19 04:30 to 2026-04-19 04:45 (UTC), within ETH’s 15-minute candlestick chart, the return recorded -0.58%, and the price range was 2321.62 to 2342.04 USDT, with an amplitude of 0.87%. The short-term selloff occurred against a backdrop of increased overall market volatility and a broad decline in the prices of major crypto assets; overall market risk appetite clearly fell, and traders’ wait-and-see sentiment strengthened. The main driver behind this abnormal move is a sharp contraction in liquidity in the derivatives market and leveraged funds proactively reducing positions. Data shows that over the past 24 hours, the ETH/USD perpetual contract trading volume dropped 67.16% to approximately 74.87 million, open interest edged down 3.33% to 329 million, and liquidation amounts did not expand unusually. This structure indicates that the market lacks the risk of passive cascades; more funds chose to proactively step aside and wait on the sidelines, intensifying short-term selling pressure. In addition, the long/short structure in which shorts held the upper hand (long/short ratio 47.48%:52.52%) and sentiment synchronization with the panic range reinforced the downward price trend. During the same period, major coins such as BTC and SOL also fell 2%-3.4% in tandem, further showing that this pullback was driven by system-wide risk sentiment. On-chain funds did not show any large abnormal transfers or large-scale liquidations of DeFi protocols; spot and on-chain liquidity remained generally stable, and no sudden system risk resonance was observed. Current volatility-related risks still need close monitoring, especially as overall risk appetite continues to contract—ETH’s short-term price may face further downside probing. Watch subsequent changes in derivatives trading volume and open interest, extreme shifts in the long/short ratio and funding rate, and promptly monitor on-chain fund flows, large transfers, and any signs of amplified platform net outflows. For more market anomalies and deeper analysis, please continue to follow our upcoming market updates.

GateNews3h ago

Spark Protocol's January delisting of rsETH proves prudent as Aave faces ETH liquidity crisis

Spark Protocol's strategy of delisting low-usage assets and tightening collateral has faced initial backlash but proved wise during market turmoil. While maintaining higher interest rate caps, SparkLend ensures liquidity, unlike Aave, which now faces significant risks.

GateNews4h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments