Foresight News reports that Vitalik Buterin stated on Farcaster that the goal of security is to minimize the deviation between user intent and the system’s actual behavior. “User experience” can be defined similarly, so security and user experience are not independent fields; security is more focused on tail risks (where deviation costs are high) and tail risks caused by adversarial behavior. Perfect security is impossible because “user intent” itself is extremely complex, and users find it difficult to clearly express (for example, “send 1 ETH to Bob”—Bob cannot be mathematically defined). More complex goals like “privacy protection” are also hard to define (metadata leaks far exceed encryption itself). This is similar to early AI safety issues: objectives are difficult to specify robustly.
An excellent security solution should include features such as: users expressing intent in multiple, overlapping ways, with the system only executing when multiple perspectives align. Examples include type systems in programming, formal verification, transaction simulation, post-transaction assertions, multi-signature / social recovery, spending limits, and anomaly confirmation, all of which reduce risk through redundancy. Additionally, LLMs can serve as intent simulators (general LLMs approximate human common sense, and user fine-tuning LLMs approximate the user themselves), but should never decide intent alone; they are only supplementary from different perspectives to enhance redundancy effectiveness.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
The Ethereum Beacon Chain staking contract holds over 82 million ETH, accounting for 68% of the total supply.
As of April 2026, the Ethereum Beacon Chain staking contract holds more than 82 million ETH, accounting for about 68% of the total supply. Multiple exchanges and institutions hold large amounts of ETH, and among individual holders, Vitalik Buterin is the largest holder. The U.S. government holds about 62k ETH.
GateNews2h ago
Naoris Protocol's quantum-resistant blockchain goes live as Bitcoin and Ethereum face 'Q-Day' threats
Naoris Protocol launched a quantum-resistant blockchain, designed to secure transactions against future quantum threats. It utilizes post-quantum cryptography and has validated over 100 million transactions, preparing to protect digital assets despite vulnerabilities in existing systems like Bitcoin and Ethereum.
CoinDesk3h ago
After Naoris launches, it provides quantum-secure protection for Bitcoin and Ethereum assets on a quantum blockchain
After Naoris Protocol goes live on the quantum blockchain mainnet, it uses NIST-approved post-quantum cryptography technology to ensure protection against quantum computers cracking mainstream blockchains. Users need to migrate their assets to receive quantum-safe security assurances, while Bitcoin and Ethereum developers are also exploring solutions to resist quantum attacks.
GateNews4h ago
The Ethereum Foundation re-staked $46.64 million in ETH, bringing the total amount staked to $96.59 million
Gate News announcement: April 3, according to blockchain data analytics platform Arkham, the Ethereum Foundation has again staked approximately $46.64 million worth of ETH. As of now, the Ethereum Foundation’s total amount staked cumulatively has reached $96.59 million.
GateNews5h ago
