👀 家人們,每天看行情、刷大佬觀點,卻從來不開口說兩句?你的觀點可能比你想的更有價值!
廣場新人 & 回歸福利正式上線!不管你是第一次發帖還是久違回歸,我們都直接送你獎勵!🎁
每月 $20,000 獎金等你來領!
📅 活動時間: 長期有效(月底結算)
💎 參與方式:
用戶需爲首次發帖的新用戶或一個月未發帖的回歸用戶。
發帖時必須帶上話題標籤: #我在广场发首帖 。
內容不限:幣圈新聞、行情分析、曬單吐槽、幣種推薦皆可。
💰 獎勵機制:
必得獎:發帖體驗券
每位有效發帖用戶都可獲得 $50 倉位體驗券。(注:每月獎池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太熱情,我們會繼續加碼!)
進階獎:發帖雙王爭霸
月度發帖王: 當月發帖數量最多的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
月度互動王: 當月帖子互動量(點讚+評論+轉發+分享)最高的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
📝 發帖要求:
帖子字數需 大於30字,拒絕純表情或無意義字符。
內容需積極健康,符合社區規範,嚴禁廣告引流及違規內容。
💡 你的觀點可能會啓發無數人,你的第一次分享也許就是成爲“廣場大V”的起點,現在就開始廣場創作之旅吧!
Ripple vs. SEC: Legal Drama Escalates – A Turning Point for Cryptocurrency? XRP Price Set for Major Breakout to $1
In a continued legal tussle that could potentially reshape the cryptocurrency landscape, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has intensified its efforts to seek a mid-case appeal in the ongoing Ripple vs. XRP battle. This move follows a recent ruling by Judge Analisa Torres, which found Ripple guilty of violating federal securities laws in its dealings with institutional investors while sparing retail investors.
Ripple’s Argument Against Appeal
Ripple, the blockchain-based company closely associated with the XRP cryptocurrency, had initially contested the SEC’s appeal request, asserting that it lacked sufficient merit. However, the SEC has responded assertively, emphasizing the industry-wide significance of the legal issues at hand.
The heart of the matter revolves around whether Ripple’s actions in offering XRP to retail investors on cryptocurrency exchanges amounted to a violation of securities law. The SEC contends that this question warrants the intervention of an appeals court, while Ripple has attempted to challenge the need for an appeal.
Judge Jed Rakoff, presiding over a separate case brought by the SEC, previously disagreed with Judge Torres’ ruling, underscoring the complexity and divergence of legal interpretations surrounding XRP. The SEC has cited Judge Rakoff’s differing judgment as part of its argument for an interlocutory appeal, allowing an appellate court to address certain legal questions while the case progresses in the original court.
The SEC’s filing states, “[Judge Rakoff] did reject this Court’s legal conclusion that the existence of ‘blind’ trading platform-based transactions precludes the application of Howey, as a matter of law, under virtually identical facts (sales of the crypto asset by the issuer to investors on a platform in blind bid/ask transactions).”
Should Judge Torres grant the SEC’s motion for a mid-case appeal, the case will enter the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, further complicating the already intricate legal battle. This development raises broader questions about regulatory clarity and the classification of digital assets in the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency space.
As this legal saga unfolds, it remains a focal point in the ongoing conversation about crypto regulations, leaving the crypto industry and investors eagerly awaiting further developments in the Ripple vs. SEC dispute.
Best Crypto Exchange for Everyone: