👀 家人們,每天看行情、刷大佬觀點,卻從來不開口說兩句?你的觀點可能比你想的更有價值!
廣場新人 & 回歸福利正式上線!不管你是第一次發帖還是久違回歸,我們都直接送你獎勵!🎁
每月 $20,000 獎金等你來領!
📅 活動時間: 長期有效(月底結算)
💎 參與方式:
用戶需爲首次發帖的新用戶或一個月未發帖的回歸用戶。
發帖時必須帶上話題標籤: #我在广场发首帖 。
內容不限:幣圈新聞、行情分析、曬單吐槽、幣種推薦皆可。
💰 獎勵機制:
必得獎:發帖體驗券
每位有效發帖用戶都可獲得 $50 倉位體驗券。(注:每月獎池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太熱情,我們會繼續加碼!)
進階獎:發帖雙王爭霸
月度發帖王: 當月發帖數量最多的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
月度互動王: 當月帖子互動量(點讚+評論+轉發+分享)最高的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
📝 發帖要求:
帖子字數需 大於30字,拒絕純表情或無意義字符。
內容需積極健康,符合社區規範,嚴禁廣告引流及違規內容。
💡 你的觀點可能會啓發無數人,你的第一次分享也許就是成爲“廣場大V”的起點,現在就開始廣場創作之旅吧!
Custodia Bank vs. Feds: Legal Brawl as Important as Ripple_s XRP Case: Lawyer
Wyoming-based Custodia Bank’s application to become a member of the Federal Reserve was rejected earlier this year by the Kansas City Fed. But the platform has no intention of backing down.
The legal dispute took a new turn after Custodia slapped three lawsuits against the regulator in three separate circuits. According to attorney John Deaton, Custodia’s fight against the Feds is “arguably just as important (if not more)” as the Ripple-XRP case.
Custodia vs. Feds
Custodia was founded by Morgan Stanley veteran Caitlin Long in 2020. The platform offers a bridge between digital assets and the US dollar . In its lawsuit, Custodia accused the Federal Reserve of unlawfully delaying its application for a so-called master account, which happens to be an important component necessary to effectively participate in the US financial eco.
After moving to court, Custodia notched a key win as Wyoming Federal Judge denied the Federal Reserve’s bid to dismiss its lawsuit against it. As for the Fed, its official reason for denial was concerns over Custodia’s short history and what the institution considers to be a problematic business model – that involves primarily fees, such as for storing crypto tokens, instead of investments, by lending out customer deposits.
The Fed even released an 86-page order explaining its decision in March. Its argument centers around Custodia Bank’s business model being “too risky,” indicating the platform lacks FDIC deposit insurance, which is used to make deposit holders whole in the event of a bank failure.
In short, the Fed disapproves of Custodia accepting crypto assets as deposits due to the “speculative and volatile nature of the crypto-asset eco.”
Case of Power Grab
Custodia maintained that the dispute is a clear case of a power grab by the Fed and is looking forward to the court’s review.
In a new tweet, Deaton also echoed a similar sentiment when he said that the Custodia vs. Fed case is as important as the Ripple vs. SEC battle, in which the blockchain firm scored a partial victory. The attorney believes the Custodia lawsuit serves as a clear example that major regulators have been neglecting their statutory obligations.
Deaton further added that the court cases are threatening to end the Federal Reserve’s “arbitrary and capricious conduct.”