Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Bilibili's "Old Cat Fish Doesn't Eat Fish," someone asked me what I think.
Simply put, it's about cutting leeks.
Talking in riddles, using a bunch of words you don't understand.
It's not that you're uneducated, he's deliberately making it hard for you to understand.
If you understand, how does that make him seem profound?
How does he charge membership fees?
I've seen many bloggers like this.
Dressing up knowledge, selling emotions and stances.
Saying the 80s and 90s developed well because they didn't challenge foreign countries.
Saying now it's not working because they did challenge.
This kind of logic sounds smooth, but it's all nonsense.
What was exchanged for the development after reform and opening up?
It was earned through the hard work of several generations.
It was fought out by countless workers working in three shifts.
Not foreign aid, and definitely not from challenging foreign countries.
Why does he say that?
Because it gets views.
A few insults, stirring up trouble, arguments in the comment section, and the heat rises.
Once there's heat, members will rush in, and courses will be bought.
Many people rush to become members just to hear Zhao Benshan's legendary stories.
Only to be brainwashed with ulterior motives.
It's like going to see acrobatics, and the clown suddenly starts talking politics.
Don't you find that awkward?
To identify this kind of blogger, there's one standard.
Watch whether they speak human language.
Real experts can explain complex things simply.
Amateurs, only make simple things complicated.
Intentionally using words you can't understand is just screening for fools.
And then there are those who distort history.
Preaching teachers are deliberately stirring trouble, doing good with bad intentions.
This kind of talk sounds objective, but it's actually the worst.
Denying the past is just to deny the present.
Denying the present is to sell his "prescription."
What is the prescription? Most likely, it's to get you to buy courses or believe in his set of ideas.
My advice to everyone:
Watching videos is just for fun, don’t take it seriously.
And definitely don’t become members or buy courses.
If you really want to learn something, read official history, do research.
Don’t listen to these half-baked bloggers spouting nonsense.
Knowledge bloggers are a deep water profession.
Some truly understand, some pretend to understand, some are malicious.
Old Cat Fish, like this, is both pretending and malicious.
Finally, to be honest:
Your time is valuable, don’t waste it on people like this.
If you have that much time, move a few more bricks, learn a couple of skills.
That’s a hundred times better than listening to his nonsense.