From "Transfusion" to "Adaptation"—JuChain presents a new option in the vertical public blockchain ecosystem

In recent years, nearly all public blockchains have launched funds under the banner of “ecosystem building.” However, the reality has been more challenging. Most ecosystem funds end up only leaving behind press releases and a cluster of projects that exit as soon as incentives run out. Competition based solely on performance parameters has already reached a state of “aesthetic fatigue,” and support for developers is increasingly reduced to short-term subsidies. This is less about ecosystem prosperity and more a false image built on data inflation and speculative cycles.

Amidst this industry stagnation, Ju.com has chosen a different approach. Instead of engaging in the performance race of general-purpose public blockchains, JuChain is clearly positioned as a community growth-driven, incentive-restructuring, vertical public blockchain. This strategic shift is rooted in moving away from short-term “transfusion” style funding towards building long-term “adaptation” mechanisms.

Why Ecosystem Funds Don’t End in “Transfusion” — Building Verifiable Long-Term Mechanisms

In the industry, there’s often criticism that “a $100 million fund announcement is just trust-building activity during market cooling.” But what Ju.com has prepared behind this fund is not superficial marketing but a structured operational system.

The core of this design is based on three temporal judgments.

First, the industry cycle shift. After several leverage releases from 2021 to 2024, the “fast money story” has been almost exhausted. Meanwhile, many teams still have real user bases, cash flow structures, and a certain scale foundation. They are not seeking new project launches but rather a “safe landing and upgrade” of existing models.

Second, the completion of infrastructure development. Ju ecosystem has built a comprehensive foundation by integrating trading platforms, JuChain public blockchain, wallets, and multi-chain asset infrastructure to handle assets, users, and traffic. It now truly offers a one-stop solution of “funds + tools + traffic + mechanisms” to projects.

Third, the opening of policy and industry windows. While the US has approved ETFs, asset tokenization, and experienced rapid growth in stablecoins, China is promoting asset revitalization and digital infrastructure. This indicates a shift from short-term market cycles to more structural, long-term opportunities.

Based on these judgments, the fund operation embeds a verifiable institutional design.

First, structured rules such as project tier management (S/A/B/C), clear review processes, phased resource allocation, and traceable exit mechanisms. Support is limited to projects with proposals, value exchange, and constraints—no arbitrary funding.

Second, transparency mechanisms. The fund regularly discloses project progress and淘汰状况, maintains milestone resource input records within the system, ensuring traceability.

Third, risk management brakes. From project selection to funding and withdrawal decisions, risk management teams hold veto rights at every stage. This structurally suppresses short-term data inflation and speculative behavior.

The reason this fund doesn’t just end in “transfusion” is not merely its size but the underlying mechanism. While many ecosystem funds flood the industry with large numbers without real execution, Ju.com has chosen to “reject many and strictly select.”

From General-Purpose to Adaptation Strategy — Moving Beyond Performance Competition

The public blockchain wars in the industry over the past few years have been centered on performance parameters: TPS numbers, confirmation times, transaction costs. While pursuing these metrics may seem like technical progress, they have reached a point of “aesthetic fatigue.” What users and projects truly care about are fundamental issues: Is the capital safe? Is the model solid? Is the business sustainable?

JuChain intentionally chooses not to become “another general-purpose public chain” but to build a vertical platform that “adapts” to actual market needs.

This difference manifests in three areas:

Scene Selection Adaptation

Focusing on teams that need to shift from short-term incentive-driven to long-term sustainable operations. These projects typically have real cash flows, active communities, and high dissemination capacity but struggle with historical debt or opaque structures. JuChain aims to design a bridge that evolves such projects from “short-term incentive models” to “on-chain assetization + decentralized governance.”

Integration Service Capability Adaptation

Traditional public chains provide only smart contract execution environments. Ju ecosystem offers a full closed-loop: listing and market-making support, wallet entry points, task systems, membership systems, contract templates, risk management frameworks, and actual liquidity. This enables comprehensive adaptation to project operational challenges beyond just the chain.

Qualitative Shift in Competitive Advantage

The deepest difference lies in the very foundation of competition. JuChain is not competing on performance but on the rule design that allows projects to “survive longer, more transparently, more safely.” Systems like project tier management, phased resource release, strict risk control, and exit mechanisms are the sources of long-term competitive advantage.

The results of this “non-performance adaptation” will be reflected in industry evaluations one year from now. Projects that once belonged to high-yield short-term models will have reconstructed their models on JuChain, on-chain assets, and transparent settlement. Users will shift from relying on extreme rhetoric or short-term returns to obtaining returns through membership rights, real business, and on-chain revenue sharing.

This is the only path truly achievable by the combination of “Exchange + Industry Incubation Fund + Vertical Public Chain.”

The Practical Balance in the Public Chain Triangle — Rethinking Safety, Performance, and Cost

Traditionally, public chain development has been forced to choose among “security, performance, and cost.” JuChain’s approach redefines how to confront this triangle.

Its principle is clear: prioritize safety and stability, and under this premise, achieve sufficient redundancy in performance and cost efficiency.

In safety, JuChain adopts mature foundational technology stacks and rigorous audit systems. New complexities in consensus and contract layers are tightly controlled, avoiding risky innovations.

In performance, JuChain focuses on throughput efficiency and confirmation times in real business scenarios (high-frequency deposits/withdrawals, internal settlements, delegated distributions), rather than chasing peak load test numbers. As a result, since mainnet launch, it has achieved practical processing capabilities surpassing many L1 chains and approaching top-tier L2 performance.

Cost optimization is achieved through mechanisms like transaction packing and batch settlements, keeping user costs within industry-friendly ranges.

Strict Project Selection — Eliminating “Unnecessary Transfusions”

For a $100 million fund to become a true long-term mechanism, Ju.com has set clear project selection criteria.

Support is evaluated from three perspectives:

Team and Values

Stability of core personnel, confirmation that they are not short-term speculators. Responsibility towards users, willingness to reduce extreme rhetoric and overpromising, and genuine commitment to model upgrades and on-chain transformation.

Community and Business Scale

Presence of real user base and some capital accumulation. Ability to expand community and support continuous product development. Projects in stagnation are excluded.

Ecosystem Adaptation Willingness

Preference for new business entities to be prioritized within Ju ecosystem. Cooperation on contract modifications, transparent funding, and risk management rules.

Projects explicitly rejected include those that see fund support as unconditional “transfusion” and refuse model transformation, have clear fraudulent histories or refuse due diligence, or aim for extreme leverage, overpromising, or short-term fundraising and fleeing.

To eliminate data inflation and pure speculation, the following institutional hurdles are set:

All projects must undergo a complete review process; no private channels are allowed. Funds and resources are allocated in phases linked to verifiable progress indicators and risk management standards. High-risk projects can be vetoed by risk management and legal teams, and user warning mechanisms can be activated if necessary.

Providing “Non-Financial Value” — Substantive Support for Project Survival

The $100 million fund is not the most difficult part. The truly critical element is the comprehensive support capability behind the funds.

Ju ecosystem offers “non-financial value” to partners at different levels, including:

Brand and Exposure Support

Strategic partners are continuously showcased as “strategic partners” on official sites, apps, and ecosystem events. Flagship projects become key cases in AMAs, ecosystem conferences, and media coverage.

Technical and System Integration

Support for standardized contracts, payment, rebate, task, and membership systems integration. More rational lock-up designs, user-level, and revenue structure optimization. Upgrading from traditional spreadsheet models to on-chain asset logic.

Traffic and Growth Support

Linking exchange exposure, activity resources, and push distributions. Opening wallet entry points and task systems. Co-promotions with key nodes and KOLs, community co-creation.

Compliance and Risk Framework

Sharing risk management rules and user protection frameworks, not just promises of “compliance backup.” Supporting teams to avoid clearly illegal designs or extreme risk behaviors.

Ultimately, funds only address temporary needs; tools, systems, branding, and mechanisms are what truly transform projects from “short-term games” into “long-term businesses.”

The Three-Layer Structure of RWA, DeFi, and AI — Phased Deployment of Industry Asset Circulation Infrastructure

RWA (Real-World Assets), DeFi, and AI are not parallel tracks but three functional layers on the same value chain.

RWA involves digitizing city- and nation-level assets, including building infrastructure for “digital Nasdaq”-style asset trading, transforming real assets into tradable on-chain capital.

DeFi provides transparent, efficient liquidity and price discovery mechanisms for these assets and short-term incentive projects, enabling value that was once closed off to be traded in more open markets.

AI is applied at both ends: driving user growth and intelligent investment advisory, and enhancing risk identification and compliance support, enabling more advanced project management and risk control.

The most core long-term driver is “RWA + industry assets,” representing the “integration of real production capacity on-chain.” JuChain starts from entry points of short-term incentive projects and gradually expands into digitalizing industry and city-level assets, forming a complete closed-loop from traffic to assets.

Initial Achievements and Future Priorities

Since the mainnet launch last year’s first half, JuChain has achieved three key milestones:

Stable operation of the mainnet and full online deployment of core tools (wallet, task system, contract templates). Transition from testing to mainnet was smooth, turning conceptual ideas into actual implementation.

Implementation of the industry incubation fund and operational framework. Clear institutionalization of project tier standards (S/A/B/C), review committees, phased resource deployment, and exit mechanisms, moving from announcement to execution.

Initial cooperation with project partners. Multiple projects are testing model transformations using tools and mechanisms, confirming the validity of the approach, even at an early scale.

The next 12 months will focus on three priorities:

Deepening the evaluation and support system for industry incubation projects. Strengthening selection criteria, formalizing project tracking and phased evaluation, and establishing learning flows from failed projects.

Enhancing integration across ecosystem components. Optimizing coordination among wallets, task systems, trading platforms, and chains; improving user experience; smoothing capital flows.

Supporting the staged maturity of multiple projects. Expanding initial pilot cases, testing replicability across different industry segments, and verifying scalability.

In one year, industry evaluation of JuChain will likely be summarized as “not just ‘transfusion,’ but an example of implementing an ecosystem that enables projects to ‘adapt.’”

The shift from short-term incentive models to long-term, transparent operations is not just a project issue but a reflection of industry maturity. Ju.com demonstrates that it is not the size of the funds but the underlying mechanism design that truly creates industry value.