The Trump administration is facing a serious dilemma in the process of drafting cryptocurrency market structure legislation. According to recent reports, clauses are the main differentiator between the White House’s vision and the proposals from Congress members, especially those from the Democratic Party. Patrick Witt, Executive Director of the President’s Digital Asset Advisory Committee, has provided a clear clarification regarding the government’s position in these negotiations.
Patrick Witt Emphasizes an Unnegotiable Red Line
Patrick Witt explicitly stated that the White House will not accept any provisions that directly target President Donald Trump or his family’s digital asset ventures. This statement marks the government’s commitment to protecting the personal interests of the leader from legislative oversight in this law. The executive branch has set this boundary as non-negotiable, with Witt describing his position as a “clear and firm red line.”
Anti-Corruption Clause Is the Main Point of Disagreement
The most contentious provision is the anti-corruption and ethics clause proposed by several Democratic policymakers. Witt stated that these proposals are “completely unacceptable” and deviate from the actual goal. According to his admission, the core of the legislation being developed is comprehensive crypto market regulation, not an ethics review of specific individuals. The White House hopes that the opposition party will propose a more “balanced and negotiable” version to facilitate faster legislative progress.
Stablecoins and Banking-Crypto Compromise
At the same time, the White House’s top priority is to facilitate legislation that can be submitted for presidential approval in the near future. Negotiations focus on finding a compromise between the traditional banking sector and the crypto industry regarding differences in outcomes and treatment of stablecoins. This issue has become a key point of contention in regulatory discussions, with each side defending their economic and operational interests.
Democratic Party Obstacles in the Legislative Process
Despite efforts to reach consensus, significant obstacles remain. Democrats continue to push for restrictions on senior government officials and their family members participating in the crypto industry, which is considered important to prevent potential conflicts of interest. However, the White House’s firm rejection of clauses that include personal restrictions has created a significant deadlock in the legislative process. The prospects for passing the crypto market structure law become more complex with these fundamental disagreements, and negotiations are expected to continue over the coming weeks.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Clauses Are Critical Points in the White House Cryptocurrency Legislation Negotiation
The Trump administration is facing a serious dilemma in the process of drafting cryptocurrency market structure legislation. According to recent reports, clauses are the main differentiator between the White House’s vision and the proposals from Congress members, especially those from the Democratic Party. Patrick Witt, Executive Director of the President’s Digital Asset Advisory Committee, has provided a clear clarification regarding the government’s position in these negotiations.
Patrick Witt Emphasizes an Unnegotiable Red Line
Patrick Witt explicitly stated that the White House will not accept any provisions that directly target President Donald Trump or his family’s digital asset ventures. This statement marks the government’s commitment to protecting the personal interests of the leader from legislative oversight in this law. The executive branch has set this boundary as non-negotiable, with Witt describing his position as a “clear and firm red line.”
Anti-Corruption Clause Is the Main Point of Disagreement
The most contentious provision is the anti-corruption and ethics clause proposed by several Democratic policymakers. Witt stated that these proposals are “completely unacceptable” and deviate from the actual goal. According to his admission, the core of the legislation being developed is comprehensive crypto market regulation, not an ethics review of specific individuals. The White House hopes that the opposition party will propose a more “balanced and negotiable” version to facilitate faster legislative progress.
Stablecoins and Banking-Crypto Compromise
At the same time, the White House’s top priority is to facilitate legislation that can be submitted for presidential approval in the near future. Negotiations focus on finding a compromise between the traditional banking sector and the crypto industry regarding differences in outcomes and treatment of stablecoins. This issue has become a key point of contention in regulatory discussions, with each side defending their economic and operational interests.
Democratic Party Obstacles in the Legislative Process
Despite efforts to reach consensus, significant obstacles remain. Democrats continue to push for restrictions on senior government officials and their family members participating in the crypto industry, which is considered important to prevent potential conflicts of interest. However, the White House’s firm rejection of clauses that include personal restrictions has created a significant deadlock in the legislative process. The prospects for passing the crypto market structure law become more complex with these fundamental disagreements, and negotiations are expected to continue over the coming weeks.