Most crypto traders view memecoin movements as pure gambling and irrationality. But here’s the uncomfortable truth: every meme that collapsed didn’t fail because of market irrationality—it failed because one independent variable went wrong. The question isn’t just “why do memes depreciate,” but more fundamentally: does the independent variable go on the x axis really matter more than price movement? The answer rewrites everything you thought you knew about memecoin valuation.
This framework proposes that memecoin success follows rigorous mathematical principles, not chaos. We can model this using a three-dimensional coordinate system where the x-axis represents the true independent variable—and understanding its role is the key to separating 10,000x winners from rug pulls.
The XYZ Coordinate System: Why the X-Axis Holds All the Power
Forget what you’ve learned about price charts. In the memecoin ecosystem, we need to redraw the entire coordinate system. Three variables determine everything:
The X-Axis (Narrative Density) – The Independent Variable
This is where it all starts. The x-axis contains the “genetic code” of a meme: its origin story, cultural symbols, emotional resonance, and community-created lore. Think of x as the independent variable because it doesn’t depend on price or hype—it exists on its own merits. A strong narrative can exist without capital inflow. A weak one will collapse regardless of how much money pours in.
Take narrative density as the foundational independent variable: originality, replicability, and emotional staying power. When CZ announced his dog’s name was “Broccoli,” that became the independent x-value. The market didn’t create that narrative; CZ did. Now the market had to react to it.
The Y-Axis (Propagation Nodes) – The Dependent Variable
Y represents the network effect: top-tier influencers (CZ, Elon Musk), secondary nodes (KOLs, alpha traders), and finally retail networks. Crucially, Y depends heavily on X. A mediocre narrative with 1,000 nodes will struggle more than an exceptional narrative with just 10 nodes. Y amplifies what X creates; it doesn’t create independently.
The Z-Axis (Capital Flow) – The Outcome Variable
Market capitalization, trading volume, and liquidity. Z is what happens when X (narrative) meets Y (distribution). But here’s the critical insight: Z without a solid X and Y foundation is just a needle waiting to snap. A hundred million dollars pouring into a thin-based meme creates an inverted V-shaped disaster, not a sustainable cone.
The Cone Model: Geometry Explains Why 99% of Memes Fail
The relationship between these variables isn’t linear. It follows a cone’s geometry: V = ⅓ × π × (x × y)² × z
Notice what this reveals:
Base radius ® = x × y: The quadratic relationship here is everything. A 10x improvement in narrative combined with better distribution creates not 10x consensus, but potentially 100x. This is the network effect made mathematical.
Height (h) = z: Capital inflow pushes price up, but only a broad base keeps it standing. A cone with massive height but microscopic base radius is structurally unstable—one breeze (whale exit) and it collapses.
Volume (V) = Market Cap: The actual valuation the market will support.
Coefficient ⅓: Friction. Attention decay. Not every person who hears about a meme buys it. Not every buyer holds long-term. This coefficient represents realistic market inefficiency.
The profound implication: does the independent variable go on the x axis matter more than price? Absolutely. X-axis strength determines the ceiling of what Z can achieve. You can’t cheat geometry.
Four Stages: How the Independent Variable Drives the Spiral
Successful memes follow a predictable vortex pattern. Unsuccessful ones deviate, usually by neglecting the x-axis.
Stage 1: Ignition (X + Y → Z surge)
A powerful independent variable (X) combines with a high-weight distribution node (Y), triggering capital inflow (Z). When Elon Musk tweets about Pnut (squirrel meme), he’s not just moving price—he’s validating the independent variable. The narrative of “justice for an innocent squirrel” becomes authoritative. Capital responds because the narrative is solid.
The trajectory shoots upward. Hundreds of competing Pnut tokens spawn. Most will fail because they tried to copy Z (the price spike) without copying X (the narrative substance).
Stage 2: Reflexivity Loop (Z rise strengthens Y and X)
Price becomes the best marketing channel. As Z rises, it attracts KOLs who ignored it before. Media headlines about “$10M profits” expand Y. The rising price itself makes the narrative feel more credible—psychological reflexivity.
Simultaneously, the expanded Y forces X to evolve. Communities create deeper lore, artwork, and meaning around the meme. A simple “dog coin” becomes a cultural movement.
Stage 3: Narrative Upgrade (Expanding the Base Radius)
Here’s where most memes fail. They can’t evolve X. Broccoli faced thousands of competitors all claiming the “CZ’s dog” narrative. Only the ones that upgraded X—from “cute dog” to “symbol of BNB Chain revival”—survived the PVP chaos.
Pnut’s narrative didn’t stay as “cute squirrel.” It evolved into “political resistance symbol,” expanding the consensus base far beyond crypto traders into mainstream audiences. That narrative upgrade allowed the base radius r = x × y to expand exponentially.
Stage 4: Value Black Hole (X’ supports massive Z)
Once X has been upgraded to something culturally significant, the upper limit on Z practically disappears. Early investors were “quick in, quick out” traders. Now the holder base shifts to diamond-handed believers and institutions attempting allocation.
The cone hardens. Established memes like DOGE and PEPE have such massive base radii that even 20% price crashes don’t destabilize them. Their X-axis (cultural institution status) is strong enough to hold the geometry.
The Warning: Telephone Poles vs. Pancakes
The Telephone Pole (High Z, Near-Zero R)
Devs artificially pump the z-axis through wash trading or Ponzi mechanics. But the x-axis is hollow—no real narrative. The y-axis is fake nodes—no real community. What you get is a geometric nightmare: height without base. When funds withdraw, the entire structure collapses into an inverted V. This is where 99% of Broccoli competitors ended up.
The Big Pancake (Wide R, Low Z)
Community is enthusiastic. Narrative is solid. But capital isn’t flowing. The cone exists but remains flat. It’s “praised but unpopular,” and without Z rising to validate the story, the meme remains a niche phenomenon forever.
Both failures trace back to misunderstanding the independent variable principle: does the independent variable go on the x axis matter? Yes, it determines everything that follows. Ignore X, and Y and Z become meaningless.
Broccoli: The Competition Where 99.99% Misunderstood the Axis
In early 2025, CZ announced his pet dog was “Broccoli.” The independent variable (X) was established instantly by one of the industry’s top nodes. Thousands of teams rushed to launch competing Broccoli tokens, each trying to capture Y (the hype) and Z (the capital).
But most of these projects made the same error: they assumed Z (the price pump) was the game. They didn’t understand that without expanding X (narrative differentiation) and building real Y (community stickiness), they were just tall needles waiting to snap.
The chosen winners—the 1-2 projects that survived—did so by narrative upgrade. They built real communities. They created actual utility and meaning around the Broccoli brand. They understood that the independent x-axis variable was foundational, not the price on the z-axis.
Each failed Broccoli fork demonstrated the cone collapse pattern: price spiked (z-axis), but the base radius (x × y) remained microscopic. The geometric principle was violated, and geometry always wins.
Pnut: Cross-Cultural Narrative Expansion of the Independent Variable
Pnut started as a simple squirrel meme, but watch how the independent variable evolved:
Evolved X: “Government overreach killed an innocent animal” (emotional resonance) → “Symbol of resistance to authoritarian systems” (cross-cultural narrative)
The x-axis didn’t just expand; it transformed into something that resonated with audiences far beyond crypto. Elon Musk’s amplification (adding Y-max nodes) combined with this upgraded X-axis narrative to create a consensus base that extended into mainstream politics and media.
Capital flowed at unprecedented velocity (Z) because the independent variable had achieved rare cross-demographic resonance. The cone’s base radius r = x × y became massive. Even when Z temporarily retreated, the cone stood firm due to its architectural foundation.
Pnut proved that the largest valuations don’t go to first movers. They go to projects that understand the x-axis principle: strong independent narrative variables, when combined with powerful distribution nodes, support exponentially larger capital bases.
The Geometric Truth: Why Understanding Axes Matters
Here’s what the mathematics reveals: does the independent variable go on the x axis really determine success? Every successful memecoin case study answers “yes.”
The projects that failed didn’t lack capital. Many of them had plenty of hype and initial funding. They failed because their independent variable (x-axis) was either weak, non-existent, or failed to evolve when community expansion demanded it.
The projects that succeeded built first on X (narrative foundation), then leveraged Y (distribution nodes), and then benefited from Z (capital inflow). They understood that a cone is only as stable as its base. Height without foundation is theater.
For the next generation of meme projects, the lesson is clear: stop optimizing for z-axis (price). Stop competing on who launches first or who gets the biggest hype.
Start by asking: What is the independent variable? What is my x-axis narrative? Is it unique enough to replicate across different nodes? Can it evolve as my community grows? Only once you’ve answered these questions can the cone maintain its shape.
The mathematics of memecoin success isn’t mystical. It’s geometry. And geometry doesn’t lie.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Understanding Why Independent Variables Define Meme Coin Success: A Mathematical Framework for the X-Axis
Most crypto traders view memecoin movements as pure gambling and irrationality. But here’s the uncomfortable truth: every meme that collapsed didn’t fail because of market irrationality—it failed because one independent variable went wrong. The question isn’t just “why do memes depreciate,” but more fundamentally: does the independent variable go on the x axis really matter more than price movement? The answer rewrites everything you thought you knew about memecoin valuation.
This framework proposes that memecoin success follows rigorous mathematical principles, not chaos. We can model this using a three-dimensional coordinate system where the x-axis represents the true independent variable—and understanding its role is the key to separating 10,000x winners from rug pulls.
The XYZ Coordinate System: Why the X-Axis Holds All the Power
Forget what you’ve learned about price charts. In the memecoin ecosystem, we need to redraw the entire coordinate system. Three variables determine everything:
The X-Axis (Narrative Density) – The Independent Variable
This is where it all starts. The x-axis contains the “genetic code” of a meme: its origin story, cultural symbols, emotional resonance, and community-created lore. Think of x as the independent variable because it doesn’t depend on price or hype—it exists on its own merits. A strong narrative can exist without capital inflow. A weak one will collapse regardless of how much money pours in.
Take narrative density as the foundational independent variable: originality, replicability, and emotional staying power. When CZ announced his dog’s name was “Broccoli,” that became the independent x-value. The market didn’t create that narrative; CZ did. Now the market had to react to it.
The Y-Axis (Propagation Nodes) – The Dependent Variable
Y represents the network effect: top-tier influencers (CZ, Elon Musk), secondary nodes (KOLs, alpha traders), and finally retail networks. Crucially, Y depends heavily on X. A mediocre narrative with 1,000 nodes will struggle more than an exceptional narrative with just 10 nodes. Y amplifies what X creates; it doesn’t create independently.
The Z-Axis (Capital Flow) – The Outcome Variable
Market capitalization, trading volume, and liquidity. Z is what happens when X (narrative) meets Y (distribution). But here’s the critical insight: Z without a solid X and Y foundation is just a needle waiting to snap. A hundred million dollars pouring into a thin-based meme creates an inverted V-shaped disaster, not a sustainable cone.
The Cone Model: Geometry Explains Why 99% of Memes Fail
The relationship between these variables isn’t linear. It follows a cone’s geometry: V = ⅓ × π × (x × y)² × z
Notice what this reveals:
Base radius ® = x × y: The quadratic relationship here is everything. A 10x improvement in narrative combined with better distribution creates not 10x consensus, but potentially 100x. This is the network effect made mathematical.
Height (h) = z: Capital inflow pushes price up, but only a broad base keeps it standing. A cone with massive height but microscopic base radius is structurally unstable—one breeze (whale exit) and it collapses.
Volume (V) = Market Cap: The actual valuation the market will support.
Coefficient ⅓: Friction. Attention decay. Not every person who hears about a meme buys it. Not every buyer holds long-term. This coefficient represents realistic market inefficiency.
The profound implication: does the independent variable go on the x axis matter more than price? Absolutely. X-axis strength determines the ceiling of what Z can achieve. You can’t cheat geometry.
Four Stages: How the Independent Variable Drives the Spiral
Successful memes follow a predictable vortex pattern. Unsuccessful ones deviate, usually by neglecting the x-axis.
Stage 1: Ignition (X + Y → Z surge)
A powerful independent variable (X) combines with a high-weight distribution node (Y), triggering capital inflow (Z). When Elon Musk tweets about Pnut (squirrel meme), he’s not just moving price—he’s validating the independent variable. The narrative of “justice for an innocent squirrel” becomes authoritative. Capital responds because the narrative is solid.
The trajectory shoots upward. Hundreds of competing Pnut tokens spawn. Most will fail because they tried to copy Z (the price spike) without copying X (the narrative substance).
Stage 2: Reflexivity Loop (Z rise strengthens Y and X)
Price becomes the best marketing channel. As Z rises, it attracts KOLs who ignored it before. Media headlines about “$10M profits” expand Y. The rising price itself makes the narrative feel more credible—psychological reflexivity.
Simultaneously, the expanded Y forces X to evolve. Communities create deeper lore, artwork, and meaning around the meme. A simple “dog coin” becomes a cultural movement.
Stage 3: Narrative Upgrade (Expanding the Base Radius)
Here’s where most memes fail. They can’t evolve X. Broccoli faced thousands of competitors all claiming the “CZ’s dog” narrative. Only the ones that upgraded X—from “cute dog” to “symbol of BNB Chain revival”—survived the PVP chaos.
Pnut’s narrative didn’t stay as “cute squirrel.” It evolved into “political resistance symbol,” expanding the consensus base far beyond crypto traders into mainstream audiences. That narrative upgrade allowed the base radius r = x × y to expand exponentially.
Stage 4: Value Black Hole (X’ supports massive Z)
Once X has been upgraded to something culturally significant, the upper limit on Z practically disappears. Early investors were “quick in, quick out” traders. Now the holder base shifts to diamond-handed believers and institutions attempting allocation.
The cone hardens. Established memes like DOGE and PEPE have such massive base radii that even 20% price crashes don’t destabilize them. Their X-axis (cultural institution status) is strong enough to hold the geometry.
The Warning: Telephone Poles vs. Pancakes
The Telephone Pole (High Z, Near-Zero R)
Devs artificially pump the z-axis through wash trading or Ponzi mechanics. But the x-axis is hollow—no real narrative. The y-axis is fake nodes—no real community. What you get is a geometric nightmare: height without base. When funds withdraw, the entire structure collapses into an inverted V. This is where 99% of Broccoli competitors ended up.
The Big Pancake (Wide R, Low Z)
Community is enthusiastic. Narrative is solid. But capital isn’t flowing. The cone exists but remains flat. It’s “praised but unpopular,” and without Z rising to validate the story, the meme remains a niche phenomenon forever.
Both failures trace back to misunderstanding the independent variable principle: does the independent variable go on the x axis matter? Yes, it determines everything that follows. Ignore X, and Y and Z become meaningless.
Broccoli: The Competition Where 99.99% Misunderstood the Axis
In early 2025, CZ announced his pet dog was “Broccoli.” The independent variable (X) was established instantly by one of the industry’s top nodes. Thousands of teams rushed to launch competing Broccoli tokens, each trying to capture Y (the hype) and Z (the capital).
But most of these projects made the same error: they assumed Z (the price pump) was the game. They didn’t understand that without expanding X (narrative differentiation) and building real Y (community stickiness), they were just tall needles waiting to snap.
The chosen winners—the 1-2 projects that survived—did so by narrative upgrade. They built real communities. They created actual utility and meaning around the Broccoli brand. They understood that the independent x-axis variable was foundational, not the price on the z-axis.
Each failed Broccoli fork demonstrated the cone collapse pattern: price spiked (z-axis), but the base radius (x × y) remained microscopic. The geometric principle was violated, and geometry always wins.
Pnut: Cross-Cultural Narrative Expansion of the Independent Variable
Pnut started as a simple squirrel meme, but watch how the independent variable evolved:
Initial X: “Cute squirrel meme” (limited narrative)
Evolved X: “Government overreach killed an innocent animal” (emotional resonance) → “Symbol of resistance to authoritarian systems” (cross-cultural narrative)
The x-axis didn’t just expand; it transformed into something that resonated with audiences far beyond crypto. Elon Musk’s amplification (adding Y-max nodes) combined with this upgraded X-axis narrative to create a consensus base that extended into mainstream politics and media.
Capital flowed at unprecedented velocity (Z) because the independent variable had achieved rare cross-demographic resonance. The cone’s base radius r = x × y became massive. Even when Z temporarily retreated, the cone stood firm due to its architectural foundation.
Pnut proved that the largest valuations don’t go to first movers. They go to projects that understand the x-axis principle: strong independent narrative variables, when combined with powerful distribution nodes, support exponentially larger capital bases.
The Geometric Truth: Why Understanding Axes Matters
Here’s what the mathematics reveals: does the independent variable go on the x axis really determine success? Every successful memecoin case study answers “yes.”
The projects that failed didn’t lack capital. Many of them had plenty of hype and initial funding. They failed because their independent variable (x-axis) was either weak, non-existent, or failed to evolve when community expansion demanded it.
The projects that succeeded built first on X (narrative foundation), then leveraged Y (distribution nodes), and then benefited from Z (capital inflow). They understood that a cone is only as stable as its base. Height without foundation is theater.
For the next generation of meme projects, the lesson is clear: stop optimizing for z-axis (price). Stop competing on who launches first or who gets the biggest hype.
Start by asking: What is the independent variable? What is my x-axis narrative? Is it unique enough to replicate across different nodes? Can it evolve as my community grows? Only once you’ve answered these questions can the cone maintain its shape.
The mathematics of memecoin success isn’t mystical. It’s geometry. And geometry doesn’t lie.