On the undisclosed promotion phenomenon in crypto: there's a fundamental mismatch between incentives and accountability. Bad actors get paid handsomely to push dubious projects, yet the odds of getting caught remain slim—and the chances of actual legal consequences? Even thinner. This creates a perverse dynamic where the expected return on dishonest marketing dwarfs the practical risk. Sure, occasional community auditors or independent researchers might call out suspicious activity publicly, but market-level consequences rarely materialize with real teeth. When informal shaming is your main enforcement mechanism, it's little wonder the practice persists. The structural weakness isn't hard to spot: crypto moves fast, enforcement moves slow, and by the time anything happens, the cycle has already repeated.