2026-01-20 01:35:52

Ethereum's growing codebase has become a double-edged sword. With hundreds of thousands of lines spanning multiple primitives, the network now faces mounting pressures on security and decentralization—ultimately threatening its century-long trustless vision. The complexity creep isn't just a maintenance headache; it creates blind spots that could compromise the entire protocol. One proposed fix gaining traction is 'garbage collection': stripping away unnecessary layers, consolidating core functionality, and embedding protective invariants like EIP-6780 to prevent future bloat. The idea resonates across the community—simplicity isn't weakness, it's resilience. Whether Ethereum can execute this cleanup without disrupting existing ecosystems remains the trillion-dollar question. The stakes have never been higher for the world's leading smart contract platform.

ETH-2,6%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NFTHoarder

· 9h ago

The code is getting more and more bloated, which is really a problem. But I think the Ethereum team can handle this. --- The idea of garbage collection is okay, but I'm worried that changing it might cause new problems. --- Honestly, Ethereum should have started working on complexity a long time ago. Waiting until now is a bit risky. --- Simplicity is the strongest... That sounds good, but the key is actually implementing it. --- What if they accidentally break the ecosystem? Just thinking about that risk makes me a bit nervous. --- Protective measures like EIP-6780 are needed in greater numbers, or else we'll just keep piling up a mountain of shit. --- I hope they can really succeed in slimming down. Just thinking about the number of lines of code gives me a headache.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightSeller

· 9h ago

The codebase is so massive and still wants to run stably, which is truly a pipe dream. --- Garbage collection sounds good, but can it really cut anything? --- Simplicity is power, there's no doubt about that. The key is whether ETH dares to truly cut. --- Another idealistic proposal, but in practice, it's often hijacked by various ecosystems. --- EIP-6780 patches can't solve the fundamental problems; sooner or later, major surgery is needed. --- In simple terms, the more ecosystems there are, the harder it is to make changes. Now even a small adjustment requires extreme caution. --- The explosion of complexity is truly an invisible time bomb. It's a bit late to start cleaning up now. --- To be safe, it's better to wait until the mainnet is fully stable before making changes. Being too aggressive can easily cause failures.

View OriginalReply0

Ser_This_Is_A_Casino

· 01-20 17:30

Code bloat is like this; the more complex it gets, the more fragile it becomes. We really need to take drastic measures to clean it up. The idea of garbage collection is okay, but I'm worried that changing it might ruin the ecosystem. Simple = powerful. The ETH community has finally figured this out, albeit a bit late. EIP-6780 and similar patches are just band-aids; the root problem is still too much redundant design. Can we really slim down without causing a crash? Now that's the ultimate challenge. Balancing security and decentralization is easy to say but really hard to do. Complexity is like debt; once it accumulates to a certain point, it must be paid off. ETH now needs to settle its accounts.

View OriginalReply0

AllInAlice

· 01-20 02:05

The more code is written, the more problems arise. This is the current dilemma of ETH. --- Garbage collection sounds good, but I don't know if it can be truly implemented. --- That's right, simplicity is power, but ETH has already become a giant. --- EIP-6780 is a quick fix that doesn't address the root cause... the fundamental issue is still the bloated architecture. --- Wait, is it really possible to slim down without damaging the ecosystem? I'm a bit skeptical. --- It's like performing surgery on a system that has been running for ten years; the risks are ridiculously high. --- Reaching a community consensus is easy, but actually taking action is a nightmare... --- Explosion in complexity is indeed a hidden danger, but cleaning up the code might be more dangerous than adding features.

View OriginalReply0

MeltdownSurvivalist

· 01-20 01:58

The code is getting bloated. If this continues, a major refactor is really needed. Simplification is power; sharpening the axe doesn't delay chopping firewood. The idea of cleaning up junk is good, but how to pass the ecological migration stage? Can ETH successfully slim down this time... it doesn't seem that simple. Complexity is easy to build up, but bringing it down is extremely difficult.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainArchaeologist

· 01-20 01:47

The code stacking like this is really scary. If it can't be simplified, it's doomed.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 01-20 01:39

The code is bloated to this extent, and frankly, it's the debt left over from expanding too quickly back then, now it has to be paid. The idea of garbage collection sounds nice, but in reality? Every cut involves a conflict of interest. Simplification ≠ Safety. I've seen this logic too many times, and it often exposes new problems instead. It's a gamble on execution, right?

View OriginalReply0

PanicSeller

· 01-20 01:37

I'm just worried that this "big cleanup" will go wrong and end up opening the door for hackers.

View OriginalReply0