When geopolitical turbulence collides with rising equity valuations, what's actually driving the markets? Here's the real question: does policy chaos ultimately matter for stock returns, or is it just noise in the short term? There are three plausible scenarios worth considering. The first possibility—and perhaps the simplest—is that political uncertainty simply doesn't move the needle on long-term returns. Sure, we see volatility spikes when headlines hit, but beneath the surface, fundamentals may be what truly dictates asset prices over time.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchroedingersFrontrun
· 6h ago
Political noise vs fundamentals, it's a common debate. It's already 2024, and people are still arguing about this? I think no one truly believes in the long-term theory; let's see after the short-term gains for the retail investors are gone.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBlackHole
· 8h ago
What’s all the fuss about geopolitics? Real profits still depend on fundamentals. Short-term fluctuations are just illusions.
View OriginalReply0
MrDecoder
· 01-19 12:45
Does policy confusion really affect returns, or is it just short-term noise? I think asking this question is a bit too idealistic... The market is simply not that rational.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTherapist
· 01-17 09:19
Haha, still talking about that fundamental analysis thing. Anyway, in the short term, it's just a gamble of luck.
View OriginalReply0
NftMetaversePainter
· 01-17 09:19
Actually, the true value proposition of market mechanics lies in its algorithmic elegance—fundamentals are just the hash value of collective human behavior encoded into price discovery. Political noise? that's merely the computational friction we observe when the market's generative processes recalibrate across temporal vectors.
Reply0
TestnetScholar
· 01-17 09:15
Policy chaos? Haha, it's all short-term noise. In the long run, fundamentals still matter.
View OriginalReply0
GlueGuy
· 01-17 09:12
The geopolitical mess, yet the stock market still keeps rising. Basically, it's the fundamentals holding it up.
View OriginalReply0
MetaNomad
· 01-17 09:10
To be honest, geopolitics is just a tool to scare retail investors... The real way to make money still depends on fundamentals.
View OriginalReply0
BrokeBeans
· 01-17 08:55
Will the political chaos really cause a market crash? To be honest, it still depends on the fundamentals. Let short-term fluctuations happen and let them fluctuate.
When geopolitical turbulence collides with rising equity valuations, what's actually driving the markets? Here's the real question: does policy chaos ultimately matter for stock returns, or is it just noise in the short term? There are three plausible scenarios worth considering. The first possibility—and perhaps the simplest—is that political uncertainty simply doesn't move the needle on long-term returns. Sure, we see volatility spikes when headlines hit, but beneath the surface, fundamentals may be what truly dictates asset prices over time.