A prominent Senate voice has raised alarms over the $WLFI project's pursuit of a US bank charter, flagging potential conflicts of interest in the regulatory review process. The core concern: the agencies evaluating the application operate under an administration that backs the initiative, creating questions about independent oversight. This regulatory friction underscores the ongoing tension between crypto projects seeking traditional banking infrastructure and lawmakers skeptical of such arrangements. The matter now sits before the Senate for further examination, reflecting broader debates about how digital asset platforms navigate the institutional guardrails designed to manage systemic risk.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DegenWhisperer
· 7h ago
ngl this is a typical political maneuver—claiming independent review on one hand, but secretly having the outcome already decided...
View OriginalReply0
DataBartender
· 7h ago
Another round of the "policy warm wind blowing" trick, where regulatory agencies rate themselves—this move really leaves me speechless...
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeAssassin
· 7h ago
Coming with the same approach again? Projects endorsed by the government can bypass review, isn't that obvious?
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 7h ago
Here we go again with political struggles. That's just how the US operates... WLFI wanted to get a banking license, but was targeted by the Senate, claiming a conflict of interest...
Honestly, things supported by the executive branch are reviewed by their own people—can that be independent? Laughs.
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxBuster
· 8h ago
It's the same old game again. The regulatory agencies are already taking sides; why should we expect independent reviews?
A prominent Senate voice has raised alarms over the $WLFI project's pursuit of a US bank charter, flagging potential conflicts of interest in the regulatory review process. The core concern: the agencies evaluating the application operate under an administration that backs the initiative, creating questions about independent oversight. This regulatory friction underscores the ongoing tension between crypto projects seeking traditional banking infrastructure and lawmakers skeptical of such arrangements. The matter now sits before the Senate for further examination, reflecting broader debates about how digital asset platforms navigate the institutional guardrails designed to manage systemic risk.