2026-01-14 06:41:21

#美国贸易赤字扩大 💹 $LIT Technical signals show a strong momentum

On the H4 timeframe, the price bottom has formed a clear long lower shadow, what does this indicate? Buyers are firmly accumulating at low levels, and sellers' attempts to push the price down have been blocked. This pattern often signals the beginning or continuation of a major trend.

The current market structure remains bullish, providing many opportunities for long positions, with a favorable risk-reward ratio.

💡 Specific views:
🔸 Entry zone: 2.18 ~ 2.22
🔸 Stop-loss setting: 1.98
🔸 Target levels: first target 2.40, second target 2.55, final target 2.80-3.00

Also keep an eye on $RIVER and $BEAT , these two coins are also worth tracking. Recently, market sentiment towards these assets has been noticeably warm, and many traders are waiting for similar technical breakouts.

Risk reminder: Although the technical outlook is optimistic, the crypto market is highly volatile. Always prioritize proper stop-loss measures.

LIT4,7%

BEAT2,85%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ser_we_are_early

· 11h ago

A long lower shadow is indeed attractive, but I still want to see if it can break 2.40 first. This kind of signal has fooled me too many times before. If LIT can really reach 3 dollars this time, I will also have to go all-in on RIVER and BEAT. Stop loss at 1.98. This setup is still relatively rational, and it's more reliable than gambling everything.

View OriginalReply0

MoonRocketTeam

· 11h ago

This long lower shadow is really amazing. The bulls holding firmly at the bottom clearly look like they're about to launch. Entered on 2.18, feeling confident, just worried about being tricked haha.

View OriginalReply0

DaoResearcher

· 11h ago

According to the Tokenomics model in the white paper, the formation logic of the long lower shadow in this wave of LIT is essentially a game-theoretic equilibrium problem among liquidity providers. It is worth noting that the incentive mechanisms for buyers and sellers are seriously incompatible at this price level. From on-chain data performance, the risk-reward ratio in the 2.18 entry zone indeed meets my basic requirements for signal-to-noise ratio. However, the key question is—can the bullish market structure assumption really hold in a highly decentralized market environment? I have some doubts about that. Regarding the synchronized tracking of RIVER and BEAT, essentially, it is about verifying the asset correlation under a certain governance mechanism. I suggest reading their economic models first before jumping in. I think setting the stop-loss at 1.98 is still too lenient. Quoting Vitalik’s view on risk management, it should be more aggressive.

View OriginalReply0

MemeCoinSavant

· 11h ago

ngl the long wick cope is real but like... statistically speaking this could just be liquidation noise lmao 🤔

Reply0

staking_gramps

· 11h ago

Long lower shadows are something I've seen many times, often just a prelude to a trap... By the way, do you really believe that 2.18 can reach 3.00? --- I'm also watching RIVER and BEAT, but as for making money... it still depends mostly on luck. --- Setting a stop-loss at 1.98 is quite ruthless; if it breaks this level, it probably won't come back. --- When did the trade deficit and coin prices start to align? Feels like every news is just riding the hype. --- The technical outlook is optimistic as hell, just waiting for a sharp drop to regret it all. --- That target of 2.40 feels too conservative; why not just go straight for 5 bucks? --- Every time, they say the risk-reward ratio is good, but in the end... I still end up losing. --- That long lower shadow is indeed interesting, but now's not the time to bet. --- I've never heard of BEAT before; should I wait and see?

View OriginalReply0